Evaluation of brand equity using balanced scorecard: Evidence from privatized Turkish firms

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

2017

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Future Academy Ltd

Erişim Hakkı

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Özet

Recent studies generally approach brand equity from a consumer oriented paradigm. Based on previous researches, the aim of this paper is to evaluate brand equity by a multidimensional perspective based on balanced scorecard approach. Besides consumer based aspect; financial, organizational, competition dimensions of brand equity are evaluated within a sample of privatized firms listed in Borsa Istanbul. For measuring brand equity, the study offers an original methodology of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model designed for fuzzy environment. Thereby, the brand equity performances of the selected privatized firms are analyzed by using Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy VIKOR methods. The results of the analyses present that consumer based dimension is the most influential determinant of brand equity performance. Likewise, financial based dimension is found out to have effects on other brand equity dimensions. Finally, the study findings prove that firms privatized with a high-public-offering-share have the best brand equity performance compared to others.

Açıklama

13th International Strategic Management Conference (ISMC) -- JUL 06-08, 2017 -- Podgorica, MONTENEGRO
WOS: 000426866600006

Anahtar Kelimeler

Brand Equity, Brand Equity Performance, Balance Scorecard, Fuzzy Method, Privatization

Kaynak

13th International Strategic Management Conference (ISMC)

WoS Q Değeri

N/A

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

34

Sayı

Künye

Dinçer, H. ve Bozaykut Bük, T. (2017). Evaluation of brand equity using balanced scorecard: Evidence from privatized Turkish firms. 13th International Strategic Management Conference (ISMC) içinde (64-76. ss.). Podgorica, Montenegro, July 06-08, 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.12.02.6