Comparison of phacoemulsification parameters using active fluidic pressure control system versus gravity-fluidic syste

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

2021

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Kare Publishing

Erişim Hakkı

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Özet

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the mean surgical time, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration timeand estimated aspiration fluid parameters in phacoemulsification surgery using an active-fluidic pressure control sys tem (AFPCS) in comparison with gravity-fluidic system (GFS). Methods: The study analysed 202 eyes of 202 patients diagnosed with senile nuclear cataract and admitted to ourclinic. Phacoemulsification surgery was performed by an experienced surgeon using the Centurion Vision System de vice and the Infiniti Vision System device. After each case, the mean surgical time, CDE, aspiration time and estimatedaspiration fluid parameters were recorded. Complicated cases were excluded from the study. Results: In the AFPCS group, the mean age of the patients was 64.15±3.83 years, with the following results: mean surgi cal time, 11.88±5.44 min; CDE, 11.63±9.37; aspiration time, 3.91±1.49 min; estimated aspiration fluid, 71.89±27.56 ml. Inthe GFS group, the mean age of the patients was 64.99±3.80 years, and the following results were obtained: mean sur gical time, 14.35±3.93 min; CDE, 13.60±7.61; aspiration time, 5.56±1.8 min; estimated aspiration fluid, 101.23±15.62 ml. Conclusion: AFPCS was found to be more successful than GFS, with low-energy consumption, shorter surgical timeand better postoperative outcomes.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Active-Fluidic System, Gravity-Fluidic System, Phacoemulsification, Cataract

Kaynak

Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation

WoS Q Değeri

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

5

Sayı

3

Künye

Bulut, A. (2021). Comparison of phacoemulsification parameters using active fluidic pressure control system versus gravity-fluidic syste. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, 5(3), 309-312. https://dx.doi.org/10.14744/ejmi.2021.25231