Response styles and avoidance strategies in bipolar disorder and healthy controls: A comparative study

dc.authorid0000-0003-3862-2705
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Sevinç
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Kaasım Fatih
dc.contributor.authorErkıran, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-12T09:54:49Z
dc.date.available2022-05-12T09:54:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to investigate stress appraisals, rumination, worry, and experiential avoidance (EA) in patients with bipolar disorder-I (BD-I) in the euthymic phase of the illness. The effects of these processes on functionality in individuals with BD-I a re also investigated. Method: Using the Stress Appraisal Measure Dispositional Form (SAM-D), Ruminative Thinking Style Questionnaire (RTSQ), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), we compared 67 BD-I patients with 70 healthy controls. Additionally, multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of functionality levels measured by the Bipolar Disorder Functioning Questionnaire (BDFQ). Results: BD-I group showed significantly higher SAM-D "threat," "uncontrollable by anyone," and "control by others" scores. The BD-I group also reported higher EA (AAQ-II) than the control group. Rumination (RTSQ) and worry (PSWQ) did not show any significant differences between groups. BDFQ was negatively predicted "uncontrollable by anyone" and positively predicted by "control by others" subdimensions of SAM-D. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that patients with BD-I have differences in stress appraisals, even in the euthymic phase. Higher AAQ-II scores seemed to be a distinctive feature for patients with BD-I that may be related to perceiving stressful situations as threatening and uncontrollable. Our results present new perspectives for psychotherapeutic interventions both for the treatment and for the improvement of the functioning of these patients.
dc.identifier.citationUlusoy, S., Yavuz, K. F. ve Erkıran, M. (2022). Response styles and avoidance strategies in bipolar disorder and healthy controls: A comparative study. Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 35(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.14744/DAJPNS.2022.00168
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/DAJPNS.2022.00168
dc.identifier.endpage33
dc.identifier.issn1018-8681
dc.identifier.issn1309-5749
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128953666
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage24
dc.identifier.trdizinid1128433
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/DAJPNS.2022.00168
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/9435
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wos000784777300004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.institutionauthorYavuz, Kaasım Fatih
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKare Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBipolar Disorder
dc.subjectExperimental Avoidance
dc.subjectRumination
dc.subjectStress Appraisal
dc.subjectWorry
dc.titleResponse styles and avoidance strategies in bipolar disorder and healthy controls: A comparative study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Yavuz-Kasiim-2022.pdf
Boyut:
179.68 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: