Potential criteria for frameworks to support the evaluation of innovative medicines in upper middle-income countries-A systematic literature review on value frameworks and multi-criteria decision analyses

dc.authorid0000-0002-6959-9168
dc.authorid0000-0002-0479-6937
dc.authorid0000-0001-6374-817X
dc.contributor.authorJakab, Ivett
dc.contributor.authorNemeth, Bertalan
dc.contributor.authorElezbawy, Baher
dc.contributor.authorKaradayı, Melis Almula
dc.contributor.authorTozan, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Sabahattin
dc.contributor.authorShen, Jie
dc.contributor.authorKalo, Zoltan
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-28T08:57:26Z
dc.date.available2020-09-28T08:57:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractBackground Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), a formal decision support framework, has been growing in popularity recently in the field of health care. MCDA can support pricing and reimbursement decisions on the macro level, which is of great importance especially in countries with more limited resources. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to facilitate the development of future MCDA frameworks, by proposing a set of criteria focusing on the purchasing decisions of single-source innovative pharmaceuticals in upper middle-income countries. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted on the decision criteria included in value frameworks (VFs) or MCDA tools. Scopus, Medline, databases of universities, websites of Health Technology Assessment Agencies, and other relevant organizations were included in the search. Double title-abstract screening and double full-text review were conducted, and all extracted data were double-checked. A team of researchers performed the merging and selection process of the extracted criteria. Results A total of 1,878 articles entered the title and abstract screening. From these, 341 were eligible to the full-text review, and 36 were included in the final data extraction phase. From these articles 394 criteria were extracted in total. After deduplication and clustering, 26 different criteria were identified. After the merging and selection process, a set of 16 general criteria was proposed. Conclusion Based on the results of the systematic literature review, a pool of 16 criteria was selected. This can serve as a starting point for constructing MCDA frameworks in upper middle-income countries after careful adaptation to the local context.
dc.description.sponsorshipNovartis International AGen_US
dc.identifier.citationJakab, I., Nemeth, B., Elezbawy, B., Karadayı, M. A., Tozan, H., Aydın, S. ... Kalo, Z. (2020). Potential criteria for frameworks to support the evaluation of innovative medicines in upper middle-income countries-A systematic literature review on value frameworks and multi-criteria decision analyses. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01203
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphar.2020.01203
dc.identifier.issn1663-9812
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/5874
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Pharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğer
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectHealth Technology Assessment
dc.subjectPharmaceutical
dc.subjectReimbursement
dc.subjectDeveloping Country
dc.subjectMultiple Criteria
dc.titlePotential criteria for frameworks to support the evaluation of innovative medicines in upper middle-income countries-A systematic literature review on value frameworks and multi-criteria decision analyses
dc.typeReview Article

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Karadayi, Melis Almula-2020.pdf
Boyut:
786.63 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: