In response to 'postoperative analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA'
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2023
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Springer
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Özet
To the Editor: We thank Tian et al. for their interest in our article [1], which evaluates the efcacy of modifed thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgery. In our randomized, prospective, single-center study, we compared M-TAPA vs port site local infltration [2]. According to our results, M-TAPA provided superior analgesia compared to traditional port site infltration. Since port site infltration is one of the most common methods for pain control after LC [3–5], we compared M-TAPA vs port site infltration. Tian et al. have performed a few criticisms about our study. Herein, we want to respond to the questions of the authors [1].
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
M?TAPA’, Analgesic Efficacy, Postoperative
Kaynak
Journal of Anesthesia
WoS Q Değeri
Q3
Scopus Q Değeri
Q2
Cilt
37
Sayı
3
Künye
Çiftçi, B., Güngör, H., Alver, S., Gölboyu, B. E., Özdenkaya, Y. ve Tulgar, S. (2023). In response to 'postoperative analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA'. Journal of Anesthesia, 37(3), 497-498. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03196-2











