In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-0768-8779
dc.contributor.authorEmir, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Gülsüm
dc.contributor.authorAyyıldız, Simel
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-10T06:39:38Z
dc.date.available2021-06-10T06:39:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study aims to compare the accuracies of full-arch models printed by two different 3D printing technologies. Materials and Methods A mandibular horseshoe-shaped master model was designed with RapidForm XOR2 softwareThe master model was printed 10 times with 3D printers using direct light processing (DLP) and PolyJet technology (n=20). The printed models were then scanned with an industrial scanner and saved in STL file. All digital models superimposed with the master model STL file and comparison of the trueness was performed using Geomagic Control 3D analysis software. The precision was calculated by superimposing combinations of the 10 data sets in each group. Results The trueness of printed models was 46 pm for the DLP printer and 51 pm for PolyJet printer; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.155). The precision of printed models was 43 pm for the DLP printer and 54 pm for PolyJet printer. DLP printed models were more precise than the PolyJet printed models (p<0.001). Conclusion The 3D printing technologies showed significant differences in the trueness of full-arch measurements. Although DLP printed models had better trueness than PolyJet printed models, all of the 3D printed models were clinically acceptable and might be used for the production of fixed restorations.
dc.identifier.citationEmir, F., Ceylan, G. ve Ayyıldız, S. (2021). In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies. European Oral Research, 55(2), 80-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.20210060
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/eor.20210060
dc.identifier.endpage85
dc.identifier.issn2630-6158
dc.identifier.issn2651-2823
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage80
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.20210060
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/7119
dc.identifier.volume55
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIstanbul University Press
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Oral Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject3D Printing
dc.subjectDirect Light Processing
dc.subjectPolyjet
dc.subjectTrueness
dc.subjectPrecision
dc.titleIn vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Ceylan-Gulsum-2021.pdf
Boyut:
429.43 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu