Comparative evaluation of conventional and OnyxCeph™ dental software measurements on cephalometric radiography

dc.authorid0000-0001-7426-5587
dc.contributor.authorİzgi, Elif
dc.contributor.authorPekiner, Filiz Namdar
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:49:31Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:49:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000472965000005
dc.description.abstractObjective: Cephalometry can be measured with traditionally conventional analysing methods (hand tracing), as well as using computers. Many dental softwares have been developed for this purpose. The reliability of these programs are often compared with the conventional method. The aim of the present study was to compare the conventional method of manual cephalometric analysis with a computerized one, OnyxCeph (TM) (Image Instruments, Chemnitz, Germany) dental software. Methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 150 patients (75 males and 75 females) age range 12-34 were traced by two methods. Conventional method and computerized (OnyxCeph) cephalometric analysis method. 2 maxillar, 3 mandibular, 2 maxillo-mandibular, 3 vertical, 7 dental and 1 soft tissue parameters; 10 angular, 8 linear totally 18 cephalometric parameters were measured. Intra-class correlation coefficients were performed for both methods to assess the reliability of the measurements. Results: The results 9 of 18 parameters were found statistically significant. They were Cd-A distance, Cd-Gn distance, Go-Me distance, GoGnSN angle, ANS-Me distance, upper incisor-NA distance, lower incisor-NB distance, lower incisor-NB angle, overbite distance. Conclusion: Despite some discrepancies in measured values between hand-tracing cephalometric analysis method and the OnyxCeph cephalometric analysis method, statistical differences were minimal and only Cd-A, Cd-Gn, Go-Me, ANS-Me, GoGnSN degrees were clinically important for cephalometric analysis OnyxCeph was evaluated as an efficient method to replace conventional method.
dc.identifier.citationİzgi, E. ve Pekiner, F. N. (2019). Comparative evaluation of conventional and OnyxCeph™ dental software measurements on cephalometric radiography. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 32(2), 87-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18038
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18038
dc.identifier.endpage95
dc.identifier.issn2528-9659
dc.identifier.issn2148-9505
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage87
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18038
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1623
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAves
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCephalometrics
dc.subjectManual Tracing
dc.subjectOnyxceph
dc.subjectComputerized Cephalometric Program
dc.subjectReliability
dc.titleComparative evaluation of conventional and OnyxCeph™ dental software measurements on cephalometric radiography
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Pekiner, Filiz Namdar.pdf
Boyut:
625.48 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text