Is there a processing preference for object relative clauses in chinese? Evidence from erps

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Talat
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Shih-Kuen
dc.contributor.authorXu, Kun-Yu
dc.contributor.authorHung, Daisy L.
dc.contributor.authorWu, Denise H.
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:50:26Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:50:26Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Dil ve Konuşma Terapisi Bölümü
dc.descriptionWOS: 000437898900001
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30038589
dc.description.abstractA consistent finding across head-initial languages, such as English, is that subject relative clauses (SRCs) are easier to comprehend than object relative clauses (ORCs). However, several studies in Mandarin Chinese, a head-final language, revealed the opposite pattern, which might be modulated by working memory (WM) as suggested by recent results from self-paced reading performance. In the present study, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded when participants with high and low WM spans (measured by forward digit span and operation span tests) read Chinese ORCs and SRCs. The results revealed an N400-P600 complex elicited by ORCs on the relativizer, whose magnitude was modulated by the WM span. On the other hand, a P600 effect was elicited by SRCs on the head noun, whose magnitude was not affected by the WM span. These findings paint a complex picture of relative clause processing in Chinese such that opposing factors involving structural ambiguities and integration of filler-gap dependencies influence processing dynamics in Chinese relative clauses.
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 102-2628-H-008-002-MY3]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by grants from National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 102-2628-H-008-002-MY3).en_US
dc.identifier.citationBulut, T., Cheng, S., Xu, K., Hung, D. ve Wu, D. (2018). Is there a processing preference for object relative clauses in chinese? Evidence from erps. Journal of Frontiers in Psycholog, 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00995
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00995
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00995
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1981
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Sa
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectRelative Clauses
dc.subjectChinese Sentence Comprehension
dc.subjectWorking Memory
dc.subjectIntegration Resources
dc.subjectStorage Resources
dc.subjectLinear Distance
dc.subjectStructural Distance
dc.subjectEvent-Related Potentials
dc.titleIs there a processing preference for object relative clauses in chinese? Evidence from erps
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Bulut, T..pdf
Boyut:
1.29 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu