Comparison of bypass versus primary angioplasty for lower extremity chronic limb-threatening peripheral arterial diseases

dc.authorid0000-0001-9919-8392
dc.authorid0000-0002-2901-4807
dc.authorid0000-0001-6643-9364
dc.authorid0000-0001-6182-5055
dc.contributor.authorUlukan, Mustafa Özer
dc.contributor.authorKarakaya, Atalay
dc.contributor.authorUğurlucan, Murat
dc.contributor.authorErkanlı, Korhan
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-05T07:31:15Z
dc.date.available2023-04-05T07:31:15Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractAim: Peripheral arterial diseases (PAD) is seen frequently with increasing age, and have a prevalence of about 20% over 70 years of age. We aimed the results of two different treatment approaches as open surgical procedures and radiological interventions. Material and Method: We reviewed the data of PAD from the online data system of the hospital. The patients treated by endovascular femoropopliteal revascularization versus open surgical femoropopliteal graft bypass between January 2016 and December 2019 were enrolled in to study. Eighty limbs of 67 patients with the symptomatic severe occlusive disease and results were evaluated in the aspect of reducing ischemia and prevention of amputation in this retrospective study. Results: 67 patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=29) was the interventional PTA/S group, group 2 (n=38) was the open surgical bypass group. 8 of the patients in Group 2 and 5 of patients in Group 1 had bilateral lesions. Patients were at a mean age of 63.44±8.98 years. The mean time of hospitalization time was significantly longer following a first-time bypass (10 vs. 8 days). The success of results was ending of claudication and ischemia and prevention of amputation of an extremity. In these aspects, there was no difference between procedure types. Conclusion: In the aspect of the length of hospital stay and infection, interventional procedures seem more benefit however in long- term evaluation, freedom from reintervention or redo bypass was significantly higher in the bypass group (92% vs 79% p<0.01).
dc.identifier.citationUlukan, M. Ö., Karakaya, A., Uğurlucan, M. ve Erkanlı, K. (2021). Comparison of bypass versus primary angioplasty for lower extremity chronic limb-threatening peripheral arterial diseases. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (Online), 4(3), 383-387. https://dx.doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.915411
dc.identifier.doi10.32322/jhsm.915411
dc.identifier.endpage387
dc.identifier.issn2636-8579
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage383
dc.identifier.trdizinid1154397
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.915411
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/10801
dc.identifier.volume4
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.institutionauthorUlukan, Mustafa Özer
dc.institutionauthorKarakaya, Atalay
dc.institutionauthorUğurlucan, Murat
dc.institutionauthorErkanlı, Korhan
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMediHealth Academy
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Health Sciences and Medicine (Online)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPeripheral Arterial Diseases
dc.subjectPeripheral Bypass Surgery
dc.subjectAngioplasty
dc.titleComparison of bypass versus primary angioplasty for lower extremity chronic limb-threatening peripheral arterial diseases
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Ulukan-Mustafa-2021.pdf
Boyut:
128.34 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: