Transcanalicular multidiode laser versus external dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction

dc.authorid0000-0002-0078-8307
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Asker
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Mehmet Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorÖner, Veysi
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-10T06:30:30Z
dc.date.available2023-04-10T06:30:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study was a comparison of the outcomes of transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy (TCLDCR) and external dacryocystorhinostomy (EXDCR) treatment for patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Methods: Thirty-one consecutive patients who underwent TCLDCR (TCLDCR group) and 68 consecutive patients who underwent EXDCR (EXDCR group) due to acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction were enrolled in the study. Follow-up visits were performed on the first day, and at the first week, first month, third month, sixth month, and every six months thereafter. Surgical success was defined as achievement of a patent osteotomy and a successful bicanalicular silicone intubation during the procedure. Anatomical success was defined by observation of a patent osteotomy on lacrimal irrigation, regardless of epiphora. The surgery time and intra- and postoperative complications were noted for each patient. Results: The TCLDCR group had a significantly shorter mean surgery time (27.9±5.5 minutes) compared with the EXDCR group (58.5±12.0 minutes) (p<0.001). However, the mean anatomical and functional rates of TCLDCR (58.0% and 54.8%, respectively) were significantly lower than those of the EXDCR group (94.1% and 91.1%, respectively) (both p<0.001). Two patients had "cheese wiring" damage of the lower canaliculus and 1 patient in the TCLDCR group had a full-thickness skin defect in the medial canthal region. No serious intra- or postoperative complication occurred in the EXDCR group. Conclusion: Although a TCLDCR procedure decreased the surgical time, it had a significantly lower success rate in the treatment of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction compared to EXDCR. The decision of the type of surgery should be made based on the cosmetic and success expectations of the patients and the presence of systemic problems.
dc.identifier.citationBulut, A., Aslan, M. G. ve Öner, V. (2021). Transcanalicular multidiode laser versus external dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Beyoglu Eye Journal, 6(4), 315-319. https://dx.doi.org/10.14744/bej.2021.04934
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/bej.2021.04934
dc.identifier.endpage319
dc.identifier.issn2459-1777
dc.identifier.issn2587-0394
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid35059580
dc.identifier.startpage315
dc.identifier.trdizinid511861
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.14744/bej.2021.04934
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/10830
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorBulut, Asker
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofBeyoglu Eye Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectAcquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
dc.subjectExternal Dacryocystorhinostomy
dc.subjectTranscanalicular Multdiode Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy
dc.titleTranscanalicular multidiode laser versus external dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Bulut-Asker-2021.pdf
Boyut:
227.98 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: