Septoplasty: Under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-9944-196X
dc.contributor.authorDaşkaya, Hayrettin
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Haşmet
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorHaberal Can, İlknur
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:52:19Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:52:19Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000339973800014
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 24384631
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 +/- A 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 +/- A 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 +/- A 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 +/- A 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.
dc.identifier.citationDaşkaya, H., Yazıcı, H., Doğan, S. ve Haberal Can, İ. (2014). Septoplasty: Under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 271(9), 2433-2436. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6
dc.identifier.endpage2436
dc.identifier.issn0937-4477
dc.identifier.issn1434-4726
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage2433
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2380
dc.identifier.volume271
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectSeptoplasty
dc.subjectCost Analysis
dc.subjectSedation Anesthesia
dc.subjectGeneral Anesthesia
dc.titleSeptoplasty: Under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Haberal Can, Ilknur-2014.pdf
Boyut:
177.88 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu