Septoplasty: Under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

2014

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Springer

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess

Özet

The objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 +/- A 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 +/- A 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 +/- A 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 +/- A 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.

Açıklama

WOS: 000339973800014
PubMed ID: 24384631

Anahtar Kelimeler

Septoplasty, Cost Analysis, Sedation Anesthesia, General Anesthesia

Kaynak

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

WoS Q Değeri

Q2

Scopus Q Değeri

Q2

Cilt

271

Sayı

9

Künye

Daşkaya, H., Yazıcı, H., Doğan, S. ve Haberal Can, İ. (2014). Septoplasty: Under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 271(9), 2433-2436. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6