Comparison of the efficiencies of intrathecal and intraganglionic injections in mouse dorsal root ganglion

dc.authorid0000-0002-6393-1465
dc.authorid0000-0001-9037-5217
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Mehmet Şerif
dc.contributor.authorYiğit, Esra Nur
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-14T09:19:09Z
dc.date.available2023-11-14T09:19:09Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Rektörlük, Rejeneratif ve Restoratif Tıp Araştırmaları Merkezi (REMER)
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Rektörlük, Sağlık Bilim ve Teknolojileri Araştırma Enstitüsü
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are structures containing primary sensory neurons. Intraganglionic (IG) and intrathecal (IT) applications are the most common methods used for viral vector transfer to DRG. We aim to compare the efficiencies and pathological effects of IT and IG viral vector delivery methods to DRG, through in vivo imaging. Materials and methods: Mice were divided into four groups of six each: IT, IG, IT-vehicle, and IG-vehicle. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) injection was performed for EGFP expression in IT/IG groups. DRGs were made visible through vertebral window surgery and visualized with multiphoton microscopy. After imaging, spinal cords and DRGs were removed and cleared, then imaged with light sheet microscopy. Results: No neuronal death was observed after IT injection, while the death rate was 17% 24 h after IG injection. EGFP expression efficiencies were 90%–95% of neurons in both groups. EGFP expression was only observed in targeted L2 DRG after IG injection, while it was observed in DRGs located between L1-L5 levels after IT injection. Conclusion: IT injection is a more suitable method for labeling DRG neurons in neurodegenerative injury models. However, when the innervation of DRG needs to be specifically studied, IT injection reduces this specificity due to its spread. In these studies, IG injection is the most suitable method for labeling single DRG neurons.
dc.identifier.citationAydın, M. Ş. ve Yiğit, E. N. (2023). Comparison of the efficiencies of intrathecal and intraganglionic injections in mouse dorsal root ganglion. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53(5), 1358-1366. https://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5702
dc.identifier.doi10.55730/1300-0144.5702
dc.identifier.endpage1366
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid38813001
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175526302
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1358
dc.identifier.trdizinid1209083
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5702
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11774
dc.identifier.volume53
dc.identifier.wos001108669900045en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorAydın, Mehmet Şerif
dc.institutionauthorYiğit, Esra Nur
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkiye Klinikleri
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectDorsal Root Ganglion
dc.subjectIntraganglionic Injection
dc.subjectIntrathecal Injection
dc.subjectMultiphoton Microscopy
dc.titleComparison of the efficiencies of intrathecal and intraganglionic injections in mouse dorsal root ganglion
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Aydin-Mehmet-2023.pdf
Boyut:
3.23 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: