Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Nur
dc.contributor.authorYakak, İrem
dc.contributor.authorAğ, Melih Buğra
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Nilay
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-30T10:35:59Z
dc.date.available2024-05-30T10:35:59Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖztürk, N., Yakak, İ., Ağ, M. B. ve Aksoy, N. (2024). Is ChatGPT reliable and accurate in answering pharmacotherapy-related inquiries in both Turkish and English?. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 16(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2024.04.017en_US
dc.identifier.issn1877-1297
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2024.04.017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/12542
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, is becoming more and more prevalent in the healthcare field for tasks such as disease diagnosis and medical record analysis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the proficiency and accuracy of ChatGPT in different domains of clinical pharmacy cases and queries. Methods: The study NAPLEX® Review Questions, 4th edition, pertaining to 10 different chronic conditions compared ChatGPT's responses to pharmacotherapy cases and questions obtained from McGraw Hill's, alongside the answers provided by the book's authors. The proportion of correct responses was collected and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29. Results: When tested in English, ChatGPT had substantially higher mean scores than when tested in Turkish. The average accurate score for English and Turkish was 0.41 ± 0.49 and 0.32 ± 0.46, respectively, p = 0.18. Responses to queries beginning with “Which of the following is correct?” are considerably more precise than those beginning with “Mark all the incorrect answers?” 0.66 ± 0.47 as opposed to 0.16 ± 0.36; p = 0.01 in English language and 0.50 ± 0.50 as opposed to 0.14 ± 0.34; p < 0.05in Turkish language. Conclusion: ChatGPT displayed a moderate level of accuracy while responding to English inquiries, but it displayed a slight level of accuracy when responding to Turkish inquiries, contingent upon the question format. Improving the accuracy of ChatGPT in languages other than English requires the incorporation of several components. The integration of the English version of ChatGPT into clinical practice has the potential to improve the effectiveness, precision, and standard of patient care provision by supplementing personal expertise and professional judgment. However, it is crucial to utilize technology as an adjunct and not a replacement for human decision-making and critical thinking.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectChatgpten_US
dc.subjectClinical Pharmacyen_US
dc.subjectEducational Measurementen_US
dc.subjectPharmacyen_US
dc.titleIs ChatGPT reliable and accurate in answering pharmacotherapy-related inquiries in both Turkish and English?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCurrents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learningen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Eczacılık Fakültesi, Eczacılık Meslek Bilimleri Bölümü, Klinik Eczacılık Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0009-0000-5318-4542en_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cptl.2024.04.017en_US
dc.institutionauthorYakak, İrem
dc.institutionauthorAğ, Melih Buğra
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192106000en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38702261en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster