Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy fusion techniques: Bladed and non bladed PEEK cages

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGüven, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorÇoşar, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, Bahadır
dc.contributor.authorAras, Adem Bozkurt
dc.contributor.authorAkman, Tarık
dc.contributor.authorŞafak, Özbey
dc.contributor.authorKaraarslan, Öznur
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Davut
dc.contributor.authorTokmak, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:04:14Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:04:14Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Beyin ve Sinir Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000379454800014
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27161468
dc.description.abstractAIM: The aim of this study is to compare the different types of fusion materials known as PEEK cages used during anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) surgery. MATERIAL and METHODS: A total of 67 patients were operated and evaluated retrospectively under two groups (group A: 35 PEEK cage patients, group B: 32 bladed PEEK cage patients) between 2009 and 2013. Preoperative and postoperative (postoperative first day, postoperative 1st, 3rd and 12-24th mo) images were obtained. The cervical disc heights, cervical and segmental lordotic angles of the operated levels were calculated. Pain assessment was performed and fusion rates were also compared. Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare the outcomes. RESULTS: The pain scores (especially for arm pain) were decreased significantly in both groups after surgery regardless of the type of operation technique (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between both groups at the disc height measurements of operated levels in postoperative periods (P>0.05). In addition to these; there was no significant difference between both groups of segmental and cervical lordodic angles in postoperative periods (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the fusion rates and pain scores of both groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The PEEK cage and bladed PEEK cages can be used safely to obtain fusion after ACD.
dc.identifier.citationGüven, M., Çoşar, M., Alkan, B., Aras, A. B., Akman, T., Şafak, Ö. ... Tokmak, M. (2016). Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy fusion techniques: Bladed and non bladed PEEK cages. Turkish Neurosurgery, 26(3), 404-410. https://dx.doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.12797-14.1
dc.identifier.doi10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.12797-14.1
dc.identifier.endpage410
dc.identifier.issn1019-5149
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage404
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.12797-14.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4018
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Neurosurgical Soc
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Neurosurgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnterior Cervical Discectomy
dc.subjectCage
dc.subjectFusion
dc.subjectPEEK Cage
dc.titleComparison of anterior cervical discectomy fusion techniques: Bladed and non bladed PEEK cages
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tokmak-Mehmet 2016.pdf
Boyut:
577.47 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu