Comparability of icare pro rebound tonometer with goldmann applanation and noncontact tonometer in a wide range of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTamçelik, Nevbahar
dc.contributor.authorAtalay, Eray
dc.contributor.authorCicik, Erdogan
dc.contributor.authorÖzkök, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:02:15Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:02:15Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000357766300005
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26022193
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the agreement between the reading values of the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Icare Pro rebound tonometer (IRT) and noncontact tonometer (NCT) in glaucoma patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study comprised 292 eyes of 292 patients selected from a glaucoma outpatient clinic. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured sequentially, at a 10-min interval each, in the following order: NCT, IRT and GAT. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using Pentacam HR before the IOP measurements. Results: The mean IOPs measured by the GAT, NCT and IRT were 20.17 +/- 6.73 mm Hg (range: 4-48), 19.77 +/- 6.88 mm Hg (range: 3-46) and 19.30 +/- 5.15 mm Hg (range: 7.30-44.5), respectively. The correlation coefficients of the GAT and IRT, NCT and IRT, and GAT and NCT measurements were r(2) = 0.673, r(2) = 0.663 and r(2) = 0.938 (all p <0.001), respectively. The IRT tends to overestimate in the low GAT-measuredIOPs, whereas it underestimates in high GAT-measured IOPs. The measurements of all 3 devices were also correlated with the CCT at a statistically significant level (GAT: r(2) = 0.063, NCT: r(2) = 0.063, IRT: r(2) = 0.058). Conclusion: The agreement between the IRT and GAT measurements is higher in the IOP range of 9-22 mm Hg, whereas significant discrepancies occur as the IOP deviates from normal values. The variability of the IRT and GAT measurements over a wide range of CCT is minimal.
dc.identifier.citationTamçelik, N., Atalay, E., Cicik, E. ve Özkök, A. (2015). Comparability of icare pro rebound tonometer with goldmann applanation and noncontact tonometer in a wide range of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmic Research, 54(1), 18-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000381781
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000381781
dc.identifier.endpage25
dc.identifier.issn0030-3747
dc.identifier.issn1423-0259
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage18
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000381781
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3595
dc.identifier.volume54
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relation.ispartofOphthalmic Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCorneal Thickness
dc.subjectGoldmann Applanation Tonometer
dc.subjectIcare Rebound Tonometer
dc.titleComparability of icare pro rebound tonometer with goldmann applanation and noncontact tonometer in a wide range of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu