Load-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materials

dc.authorid0000-0001-9589-3232
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk Bozkurt, Funda
dc.contributor.authorToz-Akalın, Tuğba
dc.contributor.authorGözetici, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorKuşdemir, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorÖzsoy, Alev
dc.contributor.authorGözükara Bağ, Harika
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:57:14Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:57:14Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000374585600004
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the load-bearing capacity of premolars restored with three types of resin composite materials in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities. Extracted human premolars (N=30, n=10 per group) were randomly divided into three groups; MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following resin materials: Group BFC: Bulk-fill composite (SonicFill, Kerr Corporation), Group NC: Nanohybrid resin composite (Filtek Z550, 3M ESPE), Group SC: Silorane-based composite (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE). For NC Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan) and for SC, Silorane adhesive resin (Filtek Silorane System Adhesive, 3M ESPE) were used. The cavities in NC and SC groups were restored incrementally, while those in BFC groups were restored in bulk. After water storage (24h, 37 degrees C), each tooth was subjected to compressive loading with a stainless steel ball (diameter: 4mm) perpendicular to the occlusal surface (1mm/min). Failure types were categorized according to being repairable or irrepairable. Data were statistically analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test (=0.05). Two-parameter Weibull distribution values including the Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (0) values were calculated. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with BFC (829.84), NC (701.35) and SC (807.73) did not show significant difference (p=0.72). Weibull distribution presented lower shape (0) for SC (m=2.77) and NC (m=3.09) compared to BFC (m=5.01). The incidence of repairable failures was more common in BFC (80%) compared to NC (60%) and SC (50%). Adhesive failures were more often observed in NC (80%) and SC (70%) groups.
dc.identifier.citationÖztürk Bozkurt, F., Toz Akalın, T., Gözetici, B., Kuşdemir, M., Özsoy, A., Gözükara Bağ, H. ... Özcan, M. (2016). Load-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materials. Journal Of Adhesion Science And Technology, 30(17), 1880-1890. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1168340
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2016.1168340
dc.identifier.endpage1890
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue17
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1880
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1168340
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2931
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Adhesion Science And Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectAdhesion
dc.subjectBulk-Fill Resin
dc.subjectFracture Resistance
dc.subjectNanohybrid
dc.subjectResin Composite
dc.subjectSilorane
dc.subjectSonicFill
dc.titleLoad-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materials
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Toz-Tugba 2016.pdf
Boyut:
830.89 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text