The effect of prior sandblasting of the wire on the shear bond strength of two different types of lingual retainers

dc.authorid0000-0001-9009-6218
dc.authorid0000-0003-3294-2644
dc.contributor.authorKılınç, Delal Dara
dc.contributor.authorSayar, Gülşilay
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:50:35Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:50:35Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000432494800006
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 29631817
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of total surface sandblasting on the shear bond strength of two different retainer wires. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference in the bond strength of the two types of lingual retainer wires when they are sandblasted. Materials and methods: One hundred and sixty human premolar teeth were equally divided into four groups (n = 40). A pair of teeth was embedded in self-curing acrylic resin and polished. Retainer wires were applied on the etched and rinsed surfaces of the teeth. Four retainers were used: group 1: braided retainer (0.010 x 0.028 '', Ortho Technology); group 2: sandblasted braided retainer (0.010 x 0.028 '', Ortho Technology); group 3: coaxial retainer (0.0215 '' Coaxial, 3M) and group 4: sandblasted coaxial retainer (0.0215 '' Coaxial, 3M). The specimens were tested using a universal test machine in shear mode with a crosshead speed of one mm/min. Results: One-way analysis of variance (Anova) was used to determine the significant differences among the groups. There was no significant difference (P = 0.117) among the groups according to this test. Conclusions: The null hypothesis was accepted. There was no statistically significant difference among the shear bond strength values of the four groups.
dc.identifier.citationKılınç, D. D. ve Sayar, G. (2018). The effect of prior sandblasting of the wire on the shear bond strength of two different types of lingual retainers. International Orthodontics, 16(2), 294-303. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.001
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.001
dc.identifier.endpage303
dc.identifier.issn1761-7227
dc.identifier.issn1879-680X
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage294
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2024
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Masson Sas Editeur
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectLingual Retainer
dc.subjectSandblasting
dc.subjectShear Bond Strength
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.titleThe effect of prior sandblasting of the wire on the shear bond strength of two different types of lingual retainers
dc.title.alternativeEffet du sablage préalable sur la résistance au cisaillement de deux différents arcs de contention linguale collés
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Kilinc-Delal Dara-2018.pdf
Boyut:
350.18 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text