A comparison of 120 W laser photoselective vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction by prostate cancer

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-8014-2321
dc.authorid0000-0001-9988-2944
dc.authorid0000-0001-8014-2321
dc.authorid0000-0002-4245-7506
dc.contributor.authorAltay, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorErkurt, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorKiremit, Murat Can
dc.contributor.authorHoruz, Rahim
dc.contributor.authorGüzelburç, Vahit
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Selami
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:04:25Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:04:25Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000352882700010
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25721931
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the mid-term outcomes of photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) with GreenLight HPS 120 W laser and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with prostate cancer (CaP). Patients and Methods: Seventy four patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) CaP with severe LUTS or acute urinary retention (AUR) were allocated to TURP (n = 36) or PVP (n = 38). International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), maximum flow rates (Qmax) and post-void residual volumes (V-res), PSA levels, prostate volumes, complications, catheter removal and hospitalization periods were recorded. Patients were reassessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: The catheter removal time was significantly longer in the TURP group (3.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7 days, p = 0.02), whereas failure of initial voiding trial was higher in PVP (2.7 vs. 13.1%, p = 0.01). No significant difference in IPSS, Qmax and V-res values was observed within the follow-up period between two groups. A significant difference in urethral stricture rate (8.3 vs. 0%), catheter removal time (3.8 +/- 11 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7 days) and hospital stay ( 2.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.5 days) was observed in favor of PVP. Conclusions: Palliative PVP is very safe and effective by means of symptomatic relief in patients with locally advanced CaP.
dc.identifier.citationAltay, B., Erkurt, B., Kiremit, M. C., Horuz, R., Güzelburç, V. ve Albayrak, S. (2015). A comparison of 120 W laser photoselective vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction by prostate cancer. Urologia Internationalis, 94(3), 326-329. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000366209
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000366209
dc.identifier.endpage329
dc.identifier.issn0042-1138
dc.identifier.issn1423-0399
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage326
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000366209
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4046
dc.identifier.volume94
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relation.ispartofUrologia Internationalisen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectPhotoselective Vaporization of Prostate
dc.subjectTransurethral Resection of the Prostate
dc.subjectProstate Cancer
dc.subjectBladder Outlet Obstruction
dc.subjectUrinary Retention
dc.titleA comparison of 120 W laser photoselective vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction by prostate cancer
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
altay, bulent-2015.pdf
Boyut:
82.4 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu