Comparing Dimensions of Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Grafts with Native Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

2016

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Özet

Background. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether or not there was any incompatibility between four-strand hamstring tendons taken from the same knee and the dimensions of the ACL and PCL. Methods. 15 fresh frozen cadaver hamstrings were prepared as four-strand grafts and measurements made of the ACL and PCL circumferences in the midsection were made in the narrowest part of the midsection. The cross-section areas and diameters were calculated with geometric calculations used to measure the cross-sectional area of cylinders. Accepting that the geometric insertions were elliptical, the length, width, and area were calculated for entry areas. Results. A significant relationship at 96.2% was determined between the ACL mid and the hamstring diameter. A significant relationship at 96.7% was determined between the ACL and the hamstring mid area. A significant relationship at 96.4% was determined between the PCL mid and the hamstring diameter. A significant relationship at 95.7% was determined between the PCL and the hamstring mid area. Conclusion. For the reconstruction of ACL and PCL, it was determined that there is less incompatibility between the four-strand hamstring tendons taken from the same knee and the dimensions of the midsection PCL compared to the ACL dimensions.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Comparing Dimensions, Four-Strand, Hamstring Tendon, Grafts with Native, Anterior and Posterior, Cruciate Ligaments

Kaynak

BioMed Research International

WoS Q Değeri

Q2

Scopus Q Değeri

Q1

Cilt

2016

Sayı

Künye

Yılmaz, B., Özdemir, G., Keskinöz, E. N., Tümentemur, G., Gökkuş, K. ve Demiralp, B. (2016). Comparing Dimensions of Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Grafts with Native Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments. BioMed Research International, 2016. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3795367