The effect of conventional surgery and piezoelectric surgery bone harvesting techniques on the donor site morbidity of the mandibular ramus and symphysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-1077-7342
dc.contributor.authorAltıparmak, Nur
dc.contributor.authorSoydan, Sıdıka Sinem
dc.contributor.authorUçkan, Sina
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:56:45Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:56:45Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000360419000012
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25979191
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the morbidity following bone harvesting at two different intraoral donor sites, mandibular symphysis and ramus, and to determine the effects of piezoelectric. and conventional surgical graft harvesting techniques on donor site morbidity. Intraoral block bone grafts were harvested from the symphysis (n = 44) and ramus (n = 31). The two donor site groups were divided into two subgroups according to the surgical graft harvesting method used (conventional or piezoelectric surgery). Intraoperative and postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Donor site morbidity and the harvesting techniques were compared statistically. Of 290 teeth evaluated in the symphysis group, four needed root canal treatment after surgery. The incidence of transient paresthesia in the mucosa was significantly higher in the symphysis group than in the ramus group (P = 0.004). In the symphysis group, the incidence of temporary skin and mucosa paresthesia was lower in the piezoelectric surgery subgroup than in the conventional surgery subgroup (P = 0.006 and P = 0.001, respectively). No permanent anaesthesia of any region of the skin was reported in either donor site group. VAS scores did not differ between the ramus and symphysis harvesting groups, or between the piezoelectric and conventional surgery subgroups. When the. symphysis was chosen as the donor site, minor sensory disturbances of the mucosa and teeth were recorded. The use of piezoelectric surgery during intraoral harvesting of bone blocks, especially from the symphysis, can reduce these complications.
dc.identifier.citationAltıparmak, N., Soydan, S. S. ve Uçkan, S. (2015). The effect of conventional surgery and piezoelectric surgery bone harvesting techniques on the donor site morbidity of the mandibular ramus and symphysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(9), 1131-1137. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.04.009
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2015.04.009
dc.identifier.endpage1137
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1131
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.04.009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2805
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectBone Block Grafts
dc.subjectBone Augmentation
dc.subjectPiezoelectric Surgery
dc.subjectAutologous Bone Grafts
dc.subjectMorbidity
dc.titleThe effect of conventional surgery and piezoelectric surgery bone harvesting techniques on the donor site morbidity of the mandibular ramus and symphysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
uckan, sina-2015.pdf
Boyut:
343.92 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu