Comparative analysis of percutaneous excision and radiofrequency ablation for osteoid osteoma

dc.contributor.authorAtiç, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorAlemdar, Celil
dc.contributor.authorElçi, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorDusak, Abdurrahim
dc.contributor.authorÇaçan, Mehmet Akif
dc.contributor.authorÖzkul, Emin
dc.contributor.authorAytekin, Mahmut Nedim
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-11T11:08:25Z
dc.date.available2023-07-11T11:08:25Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND This retrospective study aims to compare the efficacy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous excision and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of osteoid osteoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS We evaluated 40 patients with osteoid osteoma who underwent either percutaneous excision or radiofrequency ablation between 2012 and 2015. The cohort consisted of 10 female and 30 male patients, with a mean age of 15.1 years (range: 4-27 years) and a mean follow-up time of 19.02 months (range: 11-39 months). Percutaneous excision was performed in 20 patients, while radiofrequency ablation was performed in the remaining 20 patients. RESULTS The success rates of percutaneous excision and radiofrequency ablation were comparable, with unsuccessful outcomes observed in 10% and 5% of patients, respectively. The reasons for failure in the percutaneous excision group were attributed to a marking error and incomplete excision of the wide-based nidus. Complications were limited to pathological fracture (n=1) and deep infection (n=1) in the percutaneous excision group, while no complications were encountered in the radiofrequency ablation group. CONCLUSIONS Both percutaneous excision and radiofrequency ablation demonstrate high success rates in treating osteoid osteoma. However, radiofrequency ablation offers the advantage of a quicker return to daily activities without the need for activity restrictions or splints. While being a more cost-effective option, percutaneous excision should be considered cautiously to minimize potential complications.
dc.identifier.citationAtiç, R., Alemdar, C., Elçi, S., Dusak, A., Çaçan, M. A., Özkul, E. ... Aytekin, M. N. (2023). Comparative analysis of percutaneous excision and radiofrequency ablation for osteoid osteoma. Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 29, e940292-e940292. https://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.940292
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/MSM.940292
dc.identifier.endpagee940292
dc.identifier.issn1234-1010
dc.identifier.issn1643-3750
dc.identifier.pmid37349982
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162749328
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpagee940292
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.940292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11181
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wos001040497200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorÇaçan, Mehmet Akif
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNLM (Medline)
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectRadiofrequency Ablation
dc.subjectOsteoma, Osteoid
dc.subjectOrthopedic Procedures
dc.titleComparative analysis of percutaneous excision and radiofrequency ablation for osteoid osteoma
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Cacan-Mehmet-2023.pdf
Boyut:
937.35 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: