Comparison of shear bond strength of three different adhesives used as temporary bite raiser in daily orthodontic practice

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-9009-6218
dc.authorid0000-0003-3294-2644
dc.contributor.authorKılınç, Delal Dara
dc.contributor.authorSayar, Gülşılay
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:50:18Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:50:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000442735000003
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30006080
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three different adhesives (Transbond XT, Light Cure Adhesive, 3M Unitek; Transbond Plus, Light Cure Band Adhesive, 3M Unitek; Transbond Supreme LV, Low Viscosity Light Cure Adhesive, 3M Unitek), which were applied to the etched enamel of occlusal faces of mandibular molar teeth to gain bite opening. The null hypothesis was that there is no statistically significant difference between shear bond strength of these three adhesives. Materials and methods: Forty-eight human molar teeth were equally divided into three groups (n = 16). Teeth were embedded in self-curing acrylic resin and were polished and etched. Adhesives were applied on the teeth and all adhesives were light cured for 20 seconds. Universal Testing Machine was used for shear bond strength tests with a crosshead blade loaded at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Evaluating the type of failure was done by using Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to evaluate the remaining adhesive on the tooth. Results: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant differences between the three different orthodontic adhesives. There was no significant difference (P = 0.774) between the groups according to ANOVA test. According to Kruskal-Wallis test there was no statistically significant differences in ARI scores among groups (P <0.01). Conclusion: The null hypothesis was accepted. There was no statistically significant difference among their bond strength values. All of three materials can be used as temporary bite openers.
dc.identifier.citationKılın, D. D. ve Sayar, G. (2018). Comparison of shear bond strength of three different adhesives used as temporary bite raiser in daily orthodontic practice. International Orthodontics, 16(3), 440-449. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.06.011
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ortho.2018.06.011
dc.identifier.endpage449
dc.identifier.issn1761-7227
dc.identifier.issn1879-680X
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage440
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.06.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1943
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Masson Sas Editeur
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectBite Raiser
dc.subjectOrthodontic Adhesives
dc.subjectBond Strength
dc.subjectBonding
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.titleComparison of shear bond strength of three different adhesives used as temporary bite raiser in daily orthodontic practice
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Kilinc-Delal Dara--2018.pdf
Boyut:
279.61 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu