Effect of 3D printer, implant analog system, and implant angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts

dc.authorid0000-0002-0308-9579
dc.contributor.authorRutk?nas, Vygandas
dc.contributor.authorJegelevi?ius, Darius
dc.contributor.authorGedrimien?, Agn?
dc.contributor.authorRevilla León, Marta
dc.contributor.authorPletkus, Justinas
dc.contributor.authorAkulauskas, Mykolas
dc.contributor.authorEyüboğlu, Tan Fırat
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.contributor.authorAuškalnis, Liudas
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T11:15:17Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T11:15:17Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the accumulative effect of 3D printer, implant analog systems, and implant angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts. Methods: A reference cast, presenting a case of a three-unit implant-supported prosthesis, was scanned with a coordinate measurement machine, producing the first reference data set (CMM, n = 1). The second reference data set (n = 10) was prepared using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (Trios4). Test quadrant casts were produced using three DLP type 3D printers, Max (MAX UV385), Pro (PRO 4K65 UV), and Nex (NextDent 5100), and three implant analog systems, El (Elos), Nt (Nt-trading), and St (Straumann) (n = 90). Stone casts were also produced via analog impressions (Stone, n = 10). After digitization, the accuracy of 3D distance, local angulation (angle between implants) and global angulation (angle between the implant center axis and an axis perpendicular to the global plane) was evaluated by comparing the reference (CMM, IOS), test (3D print), and control (Stone) groups using metrology software. Data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey`s tests (?=0.05). Results: IOS was truer in 3D implant distance and more precise in capturing local angulation than Stone (p ? 0.05). Other measurements were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). The amount of error introduced in the workflow by IOS and 3D printing was mostly similar (p > 0.05). 3D printed casts had similar or even higher accuracy than Stone group (p > 0.05). In most cases, higher trueness was achieved when using PRO 4K65 UV 3D printer and Elos implant analog system (p ? 0.05). Conclusion: 3D printer, implant analog system, and implant angulation have a significant effect on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts. Limited-span implant-supported cases could be reproduced digitally with similar accuracy as conventional methods. Clinical significance: A fully digital workflow with a carefully selected 3D printer and implant analog system can increase the accuracy of digitally produced implant casts with comparable accuracy to conventional workflow.
dc.identifier.citationRutk?nas, V., Jegelevi?ius, D., Gedrimien?, A., Revilla León, M., Pletkus, J., Akulauskas, M. ... Auškalnis, L. (2024). Effect of 3D printer, implant analog system, and implant angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts. Journal of Dentistry. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105135
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105135
dc.identifier.pmid38885735
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105135
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/12671
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorEyüboğlu, Tan Fırat
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject3D Printing
dc.subjectAccuracy
dc.subjectDental Materials
dc.subjectDigital Dentistry
dc.subjectImplant Analog
dc.subjectIntraoral Scanner
dc.subjectPrecision
dc.subjectProsthodontics
dc.subjectTrueness
dc.titleEffect of 3D printer, implant analog system, and implant angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Eyüboğlu-Tan Fırat-2024.pdf
Boyut:
1.51 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: