University students' multidimensional state boredom and strategies to cope with classroom boredom

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

2021

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

National Research University Higher School of Economics

Erişim Hakkı

Attribution 4.0 International
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Özet

This study sought to examine how university students' state boredom dimensions (i.e., disengagement, high arousal, low arousal, inattention, and time perception) and their boredom coping strategies (i.e., cognitive approach, behavioral approach, cognitive avoidance, and behavioral avoidance) in the classroom are mediated in relation to gender and academic year. A total of 186 undergraduate students from a Turkish university, majoring in English language teaching in the faculty of education voluntarily participated in the study. The results indicated that the male participants experienced higher levels of boredom than the females in all levels of the state boredom. Additionally, the females had more inclination to use cognitive approach, while the male participants exhibited more behavioral approach to cope with boredom. Secondly, the participants with different academic levels only scored differently in disengagement, a state boredom dimension, and in cognitive approach, a boredom coping strategy. The findings highlight the significance of identifying student boredom and thereby specifying strategies to relieve their boredom in the classroom. Indeed, by gaining a proper understanding of the reactions triggered by boredom in classes, we would be able to spot the developmental paths of these reactions and thereby adopt the necessary measures to deal with student boredom.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

State Boredom Dimensions, Boredom Coping Strategies, University Students

Kaynak

Journal of Language and Education

WoS Q Değeri

N/A

Scopus Q Değeri

Q2

Cilt

7

Sayı

2

Künye

Solhi, M. (2021). University students' multidimensional state boredom and strategies to cope with classroom boredom. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 204-222. https://dx.doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12256