Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation using a standard ultrasonic biometer and a new optical biometer

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-9941-0031
dc.authorid0000-0001-5650-3246
dc.authorid0000-0002-0972-3833
dc.authorid0000-0002-9893-7904
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorKoçak, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Ali
dc.contributor.authorBaybora, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKaradayı, Koray
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:36:34Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:14
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:36:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractAIM:To compare the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations and refractive outcomes obtained with a new optical biometer and standard ultrasonic biometer in phacoemulsification surgery. METHODS:Thirty-seven eyes of 37 cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation were included in this prospective comparative study. The same operator performed biometer measurements in eyes with cataract using a new optical biometer (Aladdin) and a standard ultrasonic biometer (Sonomed AB 5500). Biometric parameters; axial length (AL), keratometric (K) readings, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and IOL power obtained by two devices were recorded. Postoperative actual refractive errors and errors predicted by two devices according to SRK/T formula were analyzed. The mean estimation error (EE), mean absolute estimation error (AEE) and the biometric parameters obtained by two biometers were compared. RESULTS:The AL measured by Aladdin (23.45±0.73 mm) was significantly longer than AL by ultrasonic biometer (23.2±0.75 mm) (P=0.01). The mean EE and AEE values obtained by Aladdin were significantly smaller than the values by ultrasonic biometer (P=0.0006 and 0.03 respectively). The higher percentage of eyes within ±0.5 and ±1.00 D of target refraction was also found by using Aladdin (67% and 97%). CONCLUSION:The Aladdin optical biometer showed better accuracy and yielded better refractive outcomes compared with ultrasonic biometer.
dc.description.abstract??????????????????????????????????????????????? ??:??????????37?37?????????????????????????????????????????????(Aladdin)?????????(Sonomed AB 5500)???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????SRK/T?????????????????????????(EE)?????????(AEE)???????? ??:Aladdin???(23.45±0.73 mm)???????(23.2±0.75 mm)??????????(P=0.01)?Aladdin????EE?AEE???????????(P=0.0006?0.03)???Aladdin????????????????±0.5(67%)?±1.00(97%)??? ??:Aladdin??????????????????????????
dc.identifier.citationKaya, F., Koçak, İ., Aydın, A., Baybora, H. ve Karadayı, K. (2016). Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation using a standard ultrasonic biometer and a new optical biometer. International Eye Science, 16(5), 807-810. https://dx.doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.5.04
dc.identifier.doi10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.5.04
dc.identifier.endpage810
dc.identifier.issn1672-5123
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage807
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1198
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.5.04
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Ophthalmology Press
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Eye Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAladdin Optical Biometer
dc.subjectAxial Length
dc.subjectIntraocular Lens Power Calculation
dc.subjectPostoperative Refractive Error
dc.subjectUltrasonic Biometer
dc.subjectAladdin ???????
dc.subject??????
dc.subject???
dc.subject?????????
dc.subject??????
dc.titleComparison of intraocular lens power calculation using a standard ultrasonic biometer and a new optical biometer
dc.title.alternative??????????????????????????????????
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Kaya-Faruk 2016.pdf
Boyut:
368.28 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu