Clinical comparisons of different fixed orthodontic retainers

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-8374-1418
dc.authorid0000-0001-7409-1484
dc.contributor.authorGüneş, Recep Onur
dc.contributor.authorSayar, Gülşilay
dc.contributor.authorToygar, Hilal
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-03T12:54:45Z
dc.date.available2023-03-03T12:54:45Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Periodontoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare the clinical outcomes of three different fixed lingual retainers, in terms of effects on periodontal health and success rate. Methods: Forty five patients aged 13 to 25 years were randomly assigned into three groups, using bonded upper and lower lingual retainers. The study groups were as follows: Group 1-BondA-Braid®, Group 2-everStick® ORTHO, Group 3-Super-Splint. The follow-up appointments were performed two weeks (Baseline=T0), one month (T1), three months (T2), and six months (T3) after the application of retainers. Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Probing Depth (PD), Bleeding in Probing (BOP) and Retainer Failure were assessed at each appointment. Results: The everStick Ortho group showed significantly lower PI values on the upper-lower lingual side after three (p=0.008) and six (p=0.001) months. The everStick Ortho group had significantly lower upper lingual (GI) levels after six months, and lower lingual side levels after one month. The Super-Splint group showed significantly lower PD values on the upper lingual side after six months. The everStick Ortho group presented significantly lower BOP levels after six months on the upper lingual side. No significant differences between the groups (p>0.05) in terms of retainer failure were found. Conclusions: The everStick Ortho group presented better results in terms of periodontal health. The failure rates of the retainers were similar.
dc.identifier.citationGüneş, R. O., Sayar, G. ve Toygar, H. (2022). Clinical comparisons of different fixed orthodontic retainers. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 27(6). https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e222154.oar
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e222154.oar
dc.identifier.issn2176-9451
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid36790247
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148250350
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e222154.oar
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/10567
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorGüneş, Recep Onur
dc.institutionauthorToygar, Hilal
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDental Press International
dc.relation.ispartofDental Press Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBonded Retainer
dc.subjectFixed Retainer
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectRetention
dc.subjectStability
dc.titleClinical comparisons of different fixed orthodontic retainers
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Gunes-Recep-2022.pdf
Boyut:
690.7 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu