Comparison of the shear bond strength of treated and untreated brackets on treated and untreated enamel surfaces in rebonding

dc.authorid0000-0001-9009-6218
dc.authorid0000-0003-3294-2644
dc.contributor.authorKılınç, Delal Dara
dc.contributor.authorSayar, Gülşilay
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:35:42Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:14
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:35:42Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractAim and Objective: This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of treated and untreated brackets on treated and untreated enamel surfaces in rebonding. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the SBS of the treated and untreated rebonded brackets on treated and untreated enamel surfaces. Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted premolars were bonded by the same conventional bonding method and then debonded, and the SBS of each tooth was recorded. The debonded brackets and teeth were divided into two equal groups. In the first group, the debonded brackets were recycled by direct flaming followed by alumina oxide sandblasting, and the teeth were treated with a tungsten carbide bur applied with a low-speed hand piece. In the second group, neither the teeth surfaces nor the bracket bases were treated. Rebonding was performed followed by debonding, and the SBS of each tooth was recorded again. Results: Both rebonded bracket groups showed lower SBS results than that of the first debonding tests. A statistically significant difference was found within the untreated bracket groups between the first and second debonding test (P <0.001). Conclusion: The rebonding of treated enamel surfaces and treated bracket bases showed higher SBS values compared to the untreated ones. The null hypothesis was rejected.
dc.identifier.citationKılınç, D. D. ve Sayar, G. (2018). Comparison of the shear bond strength of treated and untreated brackets on treated and untreated enamel surfaces in rebonding. Journal of Orofacial Sciences, 10(2), 69-74. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_39_18
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/jofs.jofs_39_18
dc.identifier.endpage74
dc.identifier.issn0975-8844
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage69
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/911
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_39_18
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orofacial Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectBracket Base
dc.subjectDebonding
dc.subjectEnamel Surface
dc.subjectRebonding
dc.subjectShear Bond Strength
dc.titleComparison of the shear bond strength of treated and untreated brackets on treated and untreated enamel surfaces in rebonding
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Kılınç, Delal Dara-2018.pdf
Boyut:
2.34 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text