Which unicondylar prosthesis is better in the mid- term in obese patients: Fixed or mobile?

dc.authorid0000-0003-3976-9530
dc.authorid0000-0002-8053-2239
dc.authorid0000-0001-8437-5405
dc.authorid0000-0001-6742-8464
dc.contributor.authorKuyucu, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorBülbül, Ahmet Murat
dc.contributor.authorKara, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorSay, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorErdil, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-18T11:14:17Z
dc.date.available2021-01-18T11:14:17Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractAs it is mentioned in the literature, rates of complications and revision are higher in the obese compared to non-obese patients, although obesity does not a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and successful outcomes are achieved. However, there is not any study in the literature comparing the outcomes of fixed and mobile unicompartmental prostheses which are applied in the obese patients. Objective of this study was to compare outcomes of our obese patients who we applied fixed or mobile unicompartmental arthroplasty and followed up for 8 years and over. Of 293 patients in whom we performed unicompartmental knee prosthesis due to medial gonarthrosis between 2003 and 2014, 239 patients who were regularly followed-up at least for 18 months were included in this study. Total 248 knees with 193 (77.8%) fixed including bilateral prosthesis in 9 patients and 55 (22.2%) mobile prostheses were retrospectively assessed. The study included 57 patients having BMI >30 kg/ m2 who were regularly followed-up. In the final controls; mean flexion was found as 107° (100-128°)(p < 0.05), mean extension as 3° (0-5°) and mean tibio femoral angle as 4° (1-5°) (p < 0.05) valgus. Postoperative mean WOMAC value was found as 91.23 ± 3.02 (92-96) (p < 0.05) and mean KSS score as 88.3 ± 3.94 (85-100) (p < 0.05). In the final controls, respective knee flexions were seen to be 105° (100-125°) and 108°(105-128°) in the fixed and mobile insert subgroups (p > 0.05). Unicompartmental knee prosthesis is a good treatment option which can be applied also in obese patients and has high survival rates. No significant difference was found between the prostheses with fixed and mobile insert in terms of function and knee scores. However, fixed unicompartmental prosthesis should primarily be preferred in obese patients because of the challenging surgical technique, difficult learning curve and insert dislocation that we encounter with mobile prostheses.
dc.identifier.citationKuyucu, E., Bülbül, A. M., Kara, A., Say, F. ve Erdil, M. (2018). Which unicondylar prosthesis is better in the mid- term in obese patients: Fixed or mobile? Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 84(3), 257-261.
dc.identifier.endpage261
dc.identifier.issn0001-6462
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage257
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/6277
dc.identifier.volume84
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherActa Medica Belgica
dc.relation.ispartofActa Orthopaedica Belgicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectKnee Joint
dc.subjectObesity
dc.titleWhich unicondylar prosthesis is better in the mid- term in obese patients: Fixed or mobile?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Kuyucu-Ersin-2018.pdf
Boyut:
654.95 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: