Clinical evaluation of silorane and nano-hybrid resin composite restorations in class ıı cavities up to 3 years

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk Bozkurt, Funda
dc.contributor.authorToz, Tuğba
dc.contributor.authorKara Tuncer, Aysun
dc.contributor.authorGözükara Bağ, Harika
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:02:15Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:02:15Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000387340400004
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27589274
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite (SC) vs a nano-hybrid resin composite (NHC) was evaluated in Class II cavities. From January 2012 to February 2013, a total of 29 patients (eight men, 21 women; mean age, 24 +/- 5 years) received 29 pairs of restorations using both SC (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE) and NHC (Filtek Z550, 3M ESPE) materials. Patients were followed until February 2015. One operator performed all restorations using the corresponding adhesive resins according to the manufacturers' instructions. Two calibrated independent examiners evaluated the restorations at one week, six months, and then annually using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria for anatomic form, marginal adaptation, color match, surface roughness, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity. Changes in the USPHS parameters were analyzed with the McNemar test (alpha=0.05). The mean observation period was 31.2 months. Marginal adaptation was the only parameter that showed a significant difference and was worse for SC than NHC (p=0.012). At the final recall, 17 restorations from the SC group and five from the NHC group received a score of 1 (explorer catches). These scores were significantly different between baseline and final recall for SC (p<0.001) but not for NHC (p>0.05). Both NHC and SC performed similarly in Class II restorations up to three years except for marginal adaptation, for which the latter demonstrated significant deterioration at the final recall compared with baseline.
dc.identifier.citationÖztürk-Bozkurt, F., Toz, T., Kara-Tuncer, A., Gözükara-Bağ, H. ve Özcan, M. Clinical evaluation of silorane and nano-hybrid resin composite restorations in class ıı cavities up to 3 years. Operative Dentistry, 41(6), 599-606. https://dx.doi.org/10.2341/15-259-C
dc.identifier.doi10.2341/15-259-C
dc.identifier.endpage606
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734
dc.identifier.issn1559-2863
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage599
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2341/15-259-C
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3594
dc.identifier.volume41
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry, Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectClinical
dc.subjectNano-Hybrid Resin Composite (NHC)
dc.subjectRestorations
dc.titleClinical evaluation of silorane and nano-hybrid resin composite restorations in class ıı cavities up to 3 years
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Bozkurt_Ozturk.pdf
Boyut:
99.21 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu