Methods and preliminary outcomes of pediatric auditory brainstem implantation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBayazıt, Yılmaz Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKoşaner, Julie
dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Betül Çiçek
dc.contributor.authorAtaç, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorTutar, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorGündüz, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorAltınyay, Senay
dc.contributor.authorGökdoğa, Çağıl
dc.contributor.authorAnt, Ayça
dc.contributor.authorÖzdek, Ali
dc.contributor.authorGöksu, Nebil
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:35:24Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:14
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:35:24Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective was to provide information about methods used and preliminary outcomes for pediatric ABI (auditory brainstem implant). Study Design: An analysis of outcome was performed in children who received an ABI. Methods: Twelve children received a MED-EL ABI system. Progress in audition and language was monitored through parental reports, questionnaires, profiles, and closed-set tests. Results: The median number of active electrodes was 9 of 12. Seven of 12 users consistently respond to sound, and 5 of 12 do not. Highest performers can recognize words in small sets and have begun to use some words. Conclusion: Auditory brainstem implants appear to be beneficial for some pediatric patients who cannot benefit from traditional cochlear implant surgery. Benefits in the short term can be recognition of environmental sounds, recognition of some words and very commonly used phrases, and the beginning use of words. Although some of our ABI users demonstrate no response to sound, they do want to wear their sound processors all waking hours. The cause of lack of response may be related to the second intervention, which might have led to displacement of the electrode array, or presence of additional handicaps or syndromes. However, the results are less than optimal. The relatively short postoperative follow-up duration is a considered weakness of this study.
dc.identifier.citationBayazit, Y. A., Koşaner, J., Çınar, B. Ç., Ataç, A., Tutar, H., Gündüz, B. ... Göksu, N. (2014). Methods and preliminary outcomes of pediatric auditory brainstem implantation. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 123(8), 529-536. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003489414525123
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0003489414525123
dc.identifier.endpage536
dc.identifier.issn0003-4894
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage529
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/756
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003489414525123
dc.identifier.volume123
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAnnals Publishing Company
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAuditory Brainstem Implant
dc.subjectInner Ear Malformation
dc.subjectPrelingual Hearing Loss
dc.titleMethods and preliminary outcomes of pediatric auditory brainstem implantation
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Bayazit, Yilmaz Ahmet-2014.pdf
Boyut:
107.9 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu