Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: A 4-year clinical follow-up study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGüncü, Mustafa Barış
dc.contributor.authorÇakan, Umut
dc.contributor.authorAktaş, Güliz
dc.contributor.authorNigar Güncü, Güliz
dc.contributor.authorCanay, Şenay
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:51:24Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:51:24Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000388957000017
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26924133
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to evaluate the 4-year clinical performance of tooth versus implant-supported single-unit zirconia crowns (LAVA (TM)) placed on posterior region. Twenty-four patients (10 men and 14 women) who had received 48 single crowns (24 implant-supported and 24 tooth-supported) from January 2007 to December 2009, were included. California Dental Association (CDA) quality assessment system, plaque and gingival index scores were used to evaluate the performance of the crowns at baseline and at all follow-up examinations. During the follow-up period, no fracture of zirconia coping has occurred. Major complication was chipping in three patients that required a new crown fabrication. Except for the failure ones, all crowns in both groups were rated as satisfactory at the follow-up examinations based on the CDA quality assessment criteria. There were no statistically significant differences between tooth and implant-supported crowns in terms of periodontal parameters. The present 4-year follow-up clinical study demonstrates that single-unit tooth- and implant-supported zirconia crowns have similar prosthetic and periodontal outcomes. Single-unit implant or tooth-supported zirconia crowns may be considered acceptable treatment modalities for restoration of either missing or compromised posterior teeth.
dc.identifier.citationGüncü, M. B., Çakan, U., Aktaş, G., Nigar Güncü, G. ve Canay, Ş. (2016). Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 20(9), 2467-2473. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1763-x
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-016-1763-x
dc.identifier.endpage2473
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage2467
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1763-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2209
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigationsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectZirconia
dc.subjectFollow-Up Study
dc.subjectDental Implants Clinical
dc.subjectAll Ceramic
dc.titleComparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: A 4-year clinical follow-up study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Cakan_Umut.pdf
Boyut:
308.06 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu