Real-life data regarding acute procedural success and 1-year clinical outcome of desolve bioresorbable scaffolds

Özet

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the peri-procedural success of DESolve bio-resorbable scaffolds (BRSs) and analyzed real-life data about major cardiac events during 1-year follow-up. Background: There is little information about real-life data of DESolve BRS which is a novel stent technology offering various advantages over drug eluting stents and commonly used in daily cardiology practice. Methods: We conducted this single-center and non-randomized cross-sectional study from June 2015 through August 2016 in Medipol University Department of Cardiology and included 117 patients undergoing single or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with novolimus-eluting BRS devices (152 scaffolds) (Elixir Medical Corporation). Study end points were acute device and procedural success, scaffold thrombosis and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates of DESolve BRS. Results: Device success was 96.7% and procedural success was 99.3%. We detected MACE rate as 0.9% while clinical-driven target lesion revascularization was performed in one patient. None of the patients experienced scaffold thrombosis or death. Peri-procedural complications were reported in three patients. Conclusions: High rates of successful scaffold implantations, low rates of peri-procedural complications, and major cardiac events in long-term suggest that DESolve scaffolds can safely and effectively be used in daily intervention practice by particularly experienced operators.

Açıklama

WOS: 000405215800001
PubMed ID: 28440067

Anahtar Kelimeler

Desolve BRS, Device Success, Major Cardiac Events

Kaynak

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

WoS Q Değeri

Q3

Scopus Q Değeri

Q2

Cilt

30

Sayı

3

Künye

Güneş, H. M., Gökdeniz, T., Kızılırmak Yılmaz, F., Demir, G. G., Güler, E., Güler Babür, G. ... Boztosun, B. (2017). Real-life data regarding acute procedural success and 1-year clinical outcome of desolve bioresorbable scaffolds. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 30(3), 189-194. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joic.12386