Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-9292-2074
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorDilber, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorKara, Haluk Barış
dc.contributor.authorTunçdemir, Ali Rıza
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Atiye Nilgün
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:01:38Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:01:38Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000323742200003
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 22971913
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (sandblasting, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the shear bond strength of lithium disilicate-based core (IPS Empress 2) and feldspathic ceramics (VITA VM 9). One hundred ceramic discs were divided into two groups of 50 discs each for two ceramic systems: IPS Empress 2 (group I) and VITA VM 9 (group II). Each of the two groups was further divided into five surface treatment groups (ten each) as follows: group SB, sandblasting with alumina particles (50 mu m); group HF, 5 % hydrofluoric acid etching; group L, Er:YAG laser irradiation (distance, 1 mm; 500 mJ; 20 Hz; 10 W; manually, noncontact R14 handpiece); group SB-L, sandblasting + Er:YAG laser; and group HF-L, 5 % hydrofluoric acid + Er:YAG laser. Luting cement (Panavia 2.0) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, a shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were analyzed with a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference tests (alpha = 0.05). The two-way ANOVA indicated that the shear bond strength was significantly affected by the surface treatment methods (p < 0.05), but there was no significant interaction between the ceramic systems. Group SB-L had the highest mean values for each ceramic system. Sandblasting, followed by Er:YAG laser irradiation, enhanced the bond strength, indicating its potential use as an alternative method. The atomic force microscopic evaluation revealed that group SB had the most distinct sharp peaks among the groups.
dc.identifier.citationYavuz, T., Dilber, E., Kara, H. B., Tunçdemir, A. R. ve Öztürk, A. N. (2013). Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers In Medical Science, 28(5), 1233-1239. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1201-5
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-012-1201-5
dc.identifier.endpage1239
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.issn1435-604X
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1233
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1201-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3378
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofLasers In Medical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBond Strength
dc.subjectLuting Cements
dc.subjectSurface Treatment
dc.subjectCeramic
dc.subjectEr Yag
dc.titleEffects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Kara- Haluk 2013.pdf
Boyut:
540.88 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu