Quality and reliability of trigger finger youtube videos

Uzel, Kadir; Yılmaz, Mehmet Kürşat; Çaçan, Mehmet Akif; Artuç, Merdan

Quality and reliability of trigger finger youtube videos

dc.authorid	0000-0002-3695-9884
dc.authorid	0000-0002-6398-281X
dc.authorid	0000-0003-2587-6327
dc.authorid	0000-0001-8101-0718
dc.contributor.author	Uzel, Kadir
dc.contributor.author	Yılmaz, Mehmet Kürşat
dc.contributor.author	Çaçan, Mehmet Akif
dc.contributor.author	Artuç, Merdan
dc.date.accessioned	2023-10-25T06:57:58Z
dc.date.available	2023-10-25T06:57:58Z
dc.date.issued	2023
dc.department	İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstract	Introduction. Orthopedic video contents published on YouTube are not scanned and do not go through an editorial evaluation process. It is important to determine the quality and content accuracy of health-related videos. Trigger finger is a common disease and the deterioration in quality of life. However, the quality, content and adequacy of YouTube videos as a source of information about this disease have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to investigate the quality and adequacy of the medical content of the videos on YouTube about trigger finger disease. Methods. In September 2022, the phrase “trigger finger” was entered in the YouTube search bar and the 50 most watched videos were included in the study, provided that the language of the video was English. Who uploaded the videos, real or animated content, number of views, upload date, number of comments, number of like-dislikes and video length were recorded. 3 orthopedic surgeons and 1 hand surgeon watched the videos simultaneously and separately. JAMA, DISCERN and GQS scores were calculated. Results. Average length of 50 videos is 321 seconds, number of views is 244,150, number of days from upload date to evaluation date is 1,789 days, VPI was 94, view ratio was 300. The average scores of 4 different surgeons from the parameters used for the quality and relevance analysis of the videos: JAMA 2, DISCERN 36, and GQS 2. The scores of 4 different surgeons were statistically compatible with each other (p = 0.000). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.906 for the JAMA score, 0.889 for the DISCERN score, and 0.831 for the GQS score. Conclusions. YouTube videos about trigger finger were low quality and unreliable. In the light of our study and other studies, the possibility of high-quality and reliable videos for patients can be increased by the evaluation and inspection of videos present-ed by YouTube.
dc.identifier.citation	Uzel, K., Yılmaz, M. K., Çaçan, M. A. ve Artuç, M. (2023). Quality and reliability of trigger finger youtube videos. Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal, 13(3), 463-468. https://doi.org/10.32098/mltj.03.2023.16
dc.identifier.doi	10.32098/mltj.03.2023.16
dc.identifier.endpage	468
dc.identifier.issn	2240-4554
dc.identifier.issue	3
dc.identifier.scopus	2-s2.0-85170685043
dc.identifier.scopusquality	Q3
dc.identifier.startpage	463
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.32098/mltj.03.2023.16
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11635
dc.identifier.volume	13
dc.identifier.wos	001066129600015	en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality	N/A
dc.indekslendigikaynak	Web of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynak	Scopus
dc.institutionauthor	Uzel, Kadir
dc.institutionauthor	Yılmaz, Mehmet Kürşat
dc.institutionauthor	Çaçan, Mehmet Akif
dc.institutionauthor	Artuç, Merdan
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	EDRA S.p.A
dc.relation.ispartof	Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal	en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory	Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject	Patient Education
dc.subject	Quality
dc.subject	Reliability
dc.subject	Social Media
dc.subject	Trigger Finger
dc.subject	Youtube
dc.title	Quality and reliability of trigger finger youtube videos
dc.type	Article