Investigation of the effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic and new laser-assisted irrigation activation methods on smear removal and tubular penetration

dc.authorid0000-0001-8656-7101
dc.authorid0000-0003-2087-0700
dc.authorid0000-0003-2631-3286
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gülşah
dc.contributor.authorGündoğar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorÜngör, Mete
dc.contributor.authorÖzyürek, Taha
dc.contributor.authorErkan, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Neslihan Büşra
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T07:16:36Z
dc.date.available2023-01-13T07:16:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of different irrigation activation methods on smear layer removal and tubular penetration. One hundred-five distal roots of mandibular molar teeth in total; 50 for smear removal efficiency (n = 10) analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and 55 roots were used to examine tubular penetration using confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Five different irrigation activation methods were used in this study; conventional needle irrigation (CNI), sonic irrigation device of EDDY, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), PIPS and SWEEPS techniques, which are two different laser irrigation activation methods. The obtained data were statistically analyzed and the significance level was determined as p < 0.05. At the apical level, the cleanest canal walls were observed when laser methods PIPS and SWEEPS were used, while in the middle third, there was no difference in smear removal efficiencies between all groups except for the CNI (p > 0.05). Penetration depths and percentages increased from apically to coronally in all groups. The PUI and EDDY generally showed similar penetration depths and percentages to the CNI, except at the coronal root level (p > 0.05). In all groups, when PIPS was used, it showed greater penetration depth and percentage (p < 0.05). PIPS and SWEEPS techniques showed lowest and similar smear scores compared to PUI and EDDY in the apical area where access and effectiveness of the irrigation solution are difficult.
dc.description.sponsorshipÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.citationUslu, G., Gündoğar, M., Üngör, M., Özyürek, T., Erkan, E. ve Keskin, N. B. (2023). Investigation of the effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic and new laser-assisted irrigation activation methods on smear removal and tubular penetration. Lasers in Medical Science, 38(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03697-8
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-022-03697-8
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.issn1435-604X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid36595139
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145414443
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03697-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/10301
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wos000907105400002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorGündoğar, Mustafa
dc.institutionauthorÜngör, Mete
dc.institutionauthorErkan, Erhan
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofLasers in Medical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectConfocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
dc.subjectEDDY
dc.subjectPassive Ultrasonic Irrigation
dc.subjectPIPS
dc.subjectSWEEPS
dc.titleInvestigation of the effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic and new laser-assisted irrigation activation methods on smear removal and tubular penetration
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: