Comparison of the plusOptix S09 and spot vision photorefractor to cycloretinoscopy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-2312-2521
dc.authorid0000-0001-9829-7268
dc.contributor.authorDikkaya, Funda
dc.contributor.authorKaraman Erdur, Sevil
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:35:29Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:14
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:35:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to compare refraction measurements for children with the PlusOptix S09 and Spot Vision with cycloplegic retinoscopy. Methods: One hundred thirty-six eyes of 68 children (26 boys and 42 girls) were evaluated prospectively. The subjects were separated into two groups. Group 1 comprised the subjects age between 5 and 9 years. Group 2 comprised the subjects age between 10 and 18 years. Photorefraction with PlusOptix S09, photorefraction with Spot Vision and cycloplegic retinoscopy were performed in each patient. Spherical equivalents, spherical power, cylindrical power and axis values were compared between three methods. Results: The mean age of the patients was 7.12 ± 1.5 years in group 1 and 12.24 ± 1.8 years in group 2. Spherical equivalent and spherical power measured with PlusOptix S09 were statistically smaller than measured with cycloplegic retinoscopy for group 1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.001) and for group 2 (p = 0.000, p = 0.000). The mean cylindrical power measured with PlusOptix S09 was not statistically different compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy for both groups (p = 0.314, p = 0.05). Spherical equivalents measured with Spot Vision were statistically smaller than measured with cycloplegic retinoscopy for both groups (p = 0.000, p = 0.012). Spherical power measured with Spot Vision was statistically smaller than measured with cycloplegic retinoscopy for group 1 (p = 0.000), but the difference was not statistically significant for group 2 (p = 0.084). The mean cylindrical power measured with Spot Vision was statistically higher than cycloplegic retinoscopy for both groups (p = 0.000, p = 0.012). Conclusions: PlusOptix S09 and Spot Vision devices give acceptable results for screening, but prescription of spectacles should not be made according to PlusOptix S09 or Spot Vision devices alone.
dc.identifier.citationDikkaya, F. ve Karaman Erdur, S. (2019). Comparison of the plus optix S09 and spot vision photorefractor to cycloretinoscopy. International Ophthalmology, 39(8), 1671-1678. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1026-8
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-018-1026-8
dc.identifier.endpage1678
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.issn1573-2630
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1671
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/803
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1026-8
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAmblyopia
dc.subjectCycloretinoscopy
dc.subjectPhotorefraction
dc.subjectPlusOptix S09
dc.subjectSpot Vision
dc.titleComparison of the plusOptix S09 and spot vision photorefractor to cycloretinoscopy
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Dikkaya, Funda.pdf
Boyut:
675.28 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu