Self-gripping Covidien™ ProGrip™ mesh versus polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: Multicenter short term results.

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorYener, Oktay
dc.contributor.authorKaynak, B.
dc.contributor.authorYiğitbaşı, Rafet
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorBurcu, B.
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Fikret
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:35:52Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:14
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:35:52Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes following sutureless ProGrip™ mesh repair to traditional Lichtenstein repair with polypropylene mesh secured with sutures. Data were collected prospectively and were analyzed for 57 male and 3 female patients with 60 inguinal hernias. All patients included underwent open surgical repair for inguinal hernia with polypropylene mesh or ProGrip mesh. In our two centres study sixty patients were operated; 30 were treated with Lichtenstein repair with polypropylene mesh (L group) and 30 with ProGrip mesh (P group) with or without fixation. The primary parameter measured was intensity of postoperative pain using visual analogue scale (VAS); other outcomes included assessment of early and late complication. VAS was assessed in 7 days and 4 months of the postoperative period. Our results show that VAS scored at the 7th postoperative day was 1.5 for the ProGrip mesh versus 4.4 in Lichtenstein repair group. The difference between groups was statistically significant (P=0.001). Surgery duration was significantly shorter in the P group (24.9 vs. 58.3 min; P=0.001). No recurrence was observed at 3 months in both groups. The 3-months follow-up has shown that time necessary to return to daily routine activity was significantly lower in the P group during the (P=0.001). Surgery duration, early and late postoperative, pain and return to daily routine activity rates were significantly reduced with self-gripping ProGrip mesh compared to Lichtenstein repair with polypropylene mesh.
dc.identifier.citationYılmaz, A., Yener, O., Kaynak B., Yiğitbaşı, R., Demir, M., Burcu B. ve Aksoy, F. (2013). Self-gripping Covidien™ ProGrip™ mesh versus polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: Multicenter short term results. Prague Medical Report, 114(4), 231-238. https://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2014.12
dc.identifier.doi10.14712/23362936.2014.12
dc.identifier.endpage238
dc.identifier.issn1214-6994
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage231
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/976
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2014.12
dc.identifier.volume114
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofPrague Medical Reporten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectSelf-Gripping Covidien
dc.subjectPolypropylene Mesh
dc.subjectInguinal Hernia Repair
dc.subjectMulticenter
dc.subjectShort Term Results
dc.subjectShort Term Results
dc.titleSelf-gripping Covidien™ ProGrip™ mesh versus polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: Multicenter short term results.
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
yilmaz-ahmet(2013).pdf
Boyut:
674.35 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu