Anterior segment optical coherence tomography evaluation of corneal epithelium healing time after 2 different surface ablation methods

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-2563-2149
dc.authorid0000-0001-9829-7268
dc.authorid0000-0002-2267-6656
dc.authorid0000-0002-5079-4713
dc.authorid0000-0001-8954-5055
dc.contributor.authorEliaçık, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorBayramlar, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorErdur, Sevil Karaman
dc.contributor.authorKarabela, Yunus
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Göktu?
dc.contributor.authorGülkılık, İbrahim Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorÖzsütçü, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:02:57Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:02:57Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000349405000011
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25630007
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare epithelial healing time following laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with anterior segment optic coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Methods: This prospective interventional case series study comprised 56 eyes of 28 patients that underwent laser refractive surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology, Medipol University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey, between March 2014 and May 2014. Each patient was randomized to have one eye operated on with PRK, and the other with LASEK. Patients were examined daily for 5 days, and epithelial healing time was assessed by using AS-OCT without removing therapeutic contact lens (TCL). Average discomfort scores were calculated from ratings obtained from questions regarding pain, photophobia, and lacrimation according to a scale of 0 (none) to 5. Results: The mean re-epithelialization time assessed with AS-OCT was 3.07 +/- 0.64 days in the PRK group, 3.55 +/- 0.54 days in the LASEK group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). Mean subjective discomfort score was 4.42 +/- 0.50 in the PRK eyes, and 2.85 +/- 0.44 in the LASEK eyes on the first exam day (p=0.001). The score obtained on the second (p=0.024), and third day (p=0.03) were also statistically significant. The fourth (p=0.069), and fifth days scores (p=0.1) showed no statistically significant difference between groups. Conclusion: The PRK showed a statistically significant shorter epithelial healing time, but had a statistically significant higher discomfort score until the postoperative fourth day compared with LASEK.
dc.description.abstract???????: ??? ??????? ????????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ????? 56 ? ???? ?? 28 ? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ?????????? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ??? ???? 2014? ???? 2014?. ?? ???? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ?????? )???????( ?????? ?????? ?????? )?? ?? ??(. ?? ???????? ??? ??????? ?????? ???????. ?? ??? ?? ???? ??? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??? ) ?? ??- ?? ?? ??( ???? ????? ??????? ??????? ????????. ?? ???? ???? ????? ???????? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? )????? ?? ????( ??? 5. ???????: ??????? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??? ) ?? ??- ?? ?? ??( ????: 64.0±07.3 ??? ?? ?????? ???)?? ?? ??( ? 54.0±55.3 ?? ?????? ??? )???????( ?????? ??? ?????????? ??? ? ????? ? ??????? )??= 03.0 .)??????? ????????? ????? ???????? ??? 50.0±42.4 ?? ?????? ???? ???? ??? )?? ?? ??( ? 44.0±85.2 ?? ?????? ???? ???? ??? )???????( ?? ????? ????? ?????. ???????? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ????? ???????? ?? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???? ? ???? ? ????? ???????? )??= 024.0 ? ??=03.0 ??? ???????(. ? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ??? ?????????? )??=069.0 ? ??=1.0 )??? ???????. ???????: ????? ????? ??? )?? ?? ??( ???? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ? ???? ??? ????? ? ??????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ???????.
dc.identifier.citationEliaçık, M., Bayramlar, H., Erdur, S. K., Karabela, Y., Demirci, G., Gülkılık, İ. G. ve Özsütçü, M. (2015). Anterior segment optical coherence tomography evaluation of corneal epithelium healing time after 2 different surface ablation methods. Saudi Medical Journal, 36(1), 67-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.9983
dc.identifier.doi10.15537/smj.2015.1.9983
dc.identifier.endpage72
dc.identifier.issn0379-5284
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage67
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.9983
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3773
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSaudi Arabian Armed Forces Hospital
dc.relation.ispartofSaudi Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectLASEK
dc.subjectAnterior Segment
dc.subjectCoherence Tomography
dc.titleAnterior segment optical coherence tomography evaluation of corneal epithelium healing time after 2 different surface ablation methods
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
eliacık, mustafa_2015.pdf
Boyut:
1 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu