Apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with reciproc blue, hyflex edm, and xp-endo shaper nickel-titanium files

dc.authorid0000-0001-8656-7101
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gülşah
dc.contributor.authorÖzyürek, Taha
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Koray
dc.contributor.authorGündoğar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorPlotino, Gianluca
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:50:40Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000431942400030
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 29550013
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of apically extruded debris by Reciproc Blue (REC Blue; VDW, Munich, Germany), HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland), and XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) files during root canal preparation at body temperature. Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar human teeth were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 20). The canals were instrumented using 1 of the following instruments: REC Blue, HEDM, or XPS. Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. All the procedures were performed at 35 degrees C. The amount of extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the weight value of the tooth-free apparatus from the postpreparation weight value. The data were analyzed using the KruskalWallis test at a 5% significance level. Results: All the instruments tested caused extrusion of some debris from the apical foramen. XPS extruded significantly less debris from the apex than REC Blue (P <.05). The difference among the HEDM group and the other groups was not significant (P> .05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the amount of apically extruded debris registered for the different files tested was REC Blue> HEDM> XPS, with a statistical difference only between XPS and REC Blue.
dc.identifier.citationUslu, G., Özyürek, T., Yılmaz, K., Gündoğar, M. ve Plotino, G. (2018). Apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with reciproc blue, hyflex edm, and xp-endo shaper nickel-titanium files. Journal of Endodontics, 44(5), 856-859. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018
dc.identifier.endpage859
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage856
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2045
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectAgar Gel Model
dc.subjectApical Extrusion
dc.subjectDebris
dc.subjectNickel-Titanium
dc.subjectInstruments
dc.titleApically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with reciproc blue, hyflex edm, and xp-endo shaper nickel-titanium files
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Gündoğar, M..pdf
Boyut:
215.8 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text