Radiopacity evaluation of different types of resin restorative materials using a digital radiography system

dc.authorid0000-0002-5158-3379
dc.contributor.authorGündoğdu, Ceyda
dc.contributor.authorAkgül, Sinem
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T06:51:49Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T06:51:49Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the radiopacity of 20 current dental resin composites with digital radiography.MethodsTen specimens, 10-mm in diameter and 1-mm thickness, were prepared and radiographed using phosphor plates close to Al step wedges and tooth sections. The mean grey values (MGVs) were measured using an ImageJ software program and converted to equivalent Al thickness. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane post hoc test (p < 0.05). Correlation between mean radiopacity and filler content (wt% and vol%) of the tested materials was analyzed with linear regression analysis.ResultsThe radiopacity of all composites ranged from 1.32 mm Al (Estellite Flow Quick) to 3.41 mm Al (Charisma Classic). All the tested materials, except four restorative materials, had a radiopacity equal or higher than the enamel (p < 0.05). Linear regression revealed low correlation between the radiopacity and filler content of the composite.ConclusionMajority of the materials has appropriate radiopacity for dental restorations. There was great variation in radiopacity level, may clinically affect the diagnosis.
dc.identifier.citationGündoğdu, C. ve Akgül, S. (2023). Radiopacity evaluation of different types of resin restorative materials using a digital radiography system. Oral Radiology, 39(4), 646-653. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6
dc.identifier.endpage653
dc.identifier.issn0911-6028
dc.identifier.issn1613-9674
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid36920599
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85149905642
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage646
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/12361
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wos000950090900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorGündoğdu, Ceyda
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofOral Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectAluminum Step Wedge
dc.subjectDigital Radiography
dc.subjectRadiopacity
dc.subjectResin Composites
dc.titleRadiopacity evaluation of different types of resin restorative materials using a digital radiography system
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Gundogdu-Ceyda-2023.pdf
Boyut:
817.16 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: