Comparison of 2D vena contracta area with 3D planimetric mitral valve area in rheumatoid mitral valve disease

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-0205-1138
dc.contributor.authorGök, Gülay
dc.contributor.authorSayar, Nurten
dc.contributor.authorÖz, Dilaver
dc.contributor.authorErer, Hatice Betül
dc.contributor.authorEkmekçi, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorEren, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-27T09:40:37Z
dc.date.available2019-12-27T09:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kardiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractRheumatoid valve disease is a general health problem of developing countries, and it mainly affects after the age of 40. Assessment of the correct mitral valve area (MVA) is important for the treatment of rheumatoid valve disease. However, there are contradictions between the three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) methods. A measurement with 3D echocardiography is a more accurate method to measure the MVA. However, in centers without 3D echocardiography, there are some difficulties in the accurate measurement of the MVA. The aim of this study was to assess the value of 2D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) mitral valve vena contracta area (VCA) in predicting the severity of rheumatoid mitral stenosis (RMS) by comparing 3D planimetry. A total of 24 patients (10 females and 14 males) who were diagnosed with mild/moderate/severe RMS with using pressure half time, mean transmitral gradient, and planimetry methods were included in this study. 3D images were acquired using the 3D zoom and full volume. 2D TEE VCA was measured at an angle of 140° and 60°, which was perpendicular to the former, with color Doppler and the VCA was measured with an ellipsoid area using mathematical formula. There was statistically significant relationship between the measurements of 2D VCA and 3D zoom mode MVA planimetry and MVA full measurements (MVA full volume) (p < 0.01). Calculation of the valvular area after measuring the mitral valve VCA with 2D TEE is a reliable method that is usable in centers without 3D echocardiography.
dc.identifier.citationGök, G., Sayar, N., Öz, D., Erer, H. B., Ekmekçi, A. ve Eren, M. (2020). Comparison of 2D vena contracta area with 3D planimetric mitral valve area in rheumatoid mitral valve disease. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 36(11), 2115-2120. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01673-y
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10554-019-01673-y
dc.identifier.endpage2120
dc.identifier.issn1569-5794
dc.identifier.issn1573-0743
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage2115
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01673-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4768
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Cardiovascular Imagingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subject3D-Echocardiography
dc.subjectMitral Stenosis
dc.subjectTransesophageal Echocardiogrpahy
dc.titleComparison of 2D vena contracta area with 3D planimetric mitral valve area in rheumatoid mitral valve disease
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Gök, Gülay-2020.pdf
Boyut:
1.19 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu