Nail braces as an alternative treatment for ıngrown toenails: Results from a comparison with the winograd technique

dc.authorid0000-0002-0022-0439
dc.authorid0000-0002-7794-9308
dc.authorid0000-0001-9052-4411
dc.contributor.authorGüler, Olcay
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Hamide
dc.contributor.authorMahiroğulları, Mahir
dc.contributor.authorErdil, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorİşyar, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:58:11Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:58:11Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000356836600021
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25937564
dc.description.abstractIngrown toenails are one of the most frequent nail disorders and can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches. Although discovered a long time ago, the available data are still very limited on the potential effectiveness of nail braces for ingrown toenail treatment. In the present retrospective study, we compared nail braces with surgical wedge excision using the Winograd technique with respect to the time to return to work, recurrence, interval to recurrence, and patient satisfaction. A total of 159 patients were divided into the nail brace (n = 74; mean age 29.51 + 8.48 years) and Winograd technique (n = 85; mean age 26.95 +/- 8.06 years) groups. In the nail brace group, the mean time to return to work (4.15 +/- 1.07 days) was significantly shorter than that in the Winograd technique group (13.8 +/- 2.26 days; p < .001). Patient satisfaction was significantly greater in the nail brace group (94.6%) compared with the Winograd technique group (82.4%; p = .018). Of the 159 patients, 6 (8.1%) in the nail brace group and 8 (9.4%) in the Winograd technique group developed recurrence; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p > .05). A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean interval to recurrence (12.46 +/- 1.60 versus 13.24 +/- 2.48 months, respectively; p = .031). The progression-free follow-up periods for the nail brace and Winograd technique groups were 15.45 +/- 0.22 months (95% confidence interval 15.02 to 15.88) and 17.18 +/- 0.29 months (95% confidence interval 16.61 to 17.84), respectively. We have concluded that the use of nail braces is an appropriate alternative treatment of ingrown toenails with high patient satisfaction, fast recovery times, and a low recurrence rate.
dc.identifier.citationGüler, O., Tuna, H., Mahiroğulları, M., Erdil, M., Mutlu, S. ve İşyar, M. (2015). Nail braces as an alternative treatment for ıngrown toenails: Results from a comparison with the winograd technique. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 54(4), 620-624. https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.013
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.013
dc.identifier.endpage624
dc.identifier.issn1067-2516
dc.identifier.issn1542-2224
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage620
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3124
dc.identifier.volume54
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAcademic Press
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Foot and Ankle Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectIngrown Toenail
dc.subjectNail Brace
dc.subjectNail Fold
dc.subjectNail Matrix
dc.subjectWinograd Technique
dc.titleNail braces as an alternative treatment for ıngrown toenails: Results from a comparison with the winograd technique
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
guler, olcay-2015.pdf
Boyut:
793.68 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text