Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-6705-3110
dc.authorid0000-0003-3347-1151
dc.contributor.authorDelilbaşı, Barış Çağrı
dc.contributor.authorGürler, Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:56:23Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:56:23Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000329923600019
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 24168901
dc.description.abstractObjectives:The purpose of this study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative effects of Piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting procedure.Patients and Methods:Twenty-three patients requiring direct sinus lifting were enrolled. The osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation were performed either with Piezosurgery tips or rotative diamond burs and manual membrane elevators. Time elapsed between bony window opening and completion of membrane elevation (duration), incidence of membrane perforation, visibility of the operation site, postoperative pain, swelling, sleeping, eating, phonetics, daily routine, and missed work as well as patient's expectation before and experience after the operation were evaluated.Results:There was no significant difference between Piezosurgery and conventional groups regarding incidence of membrane perforation, duration, and operation site visibility as well as patient's expectation before and experience after the operation (P > 0.05). However, there were significantly more pain and swelling in the conventional group compared with the Piezosurgery group (P 0.05).Conclusion:Sinus lifting procedure performed with Piezosurgery causes less pain and swelling postoperatively compared with conventional technique. Patients' daily life activities and experience about the operation are not affected from the surgical technique.
dc.identifier.citationDelilbaşı, B. Ç. ve Gürler, G. (2013). Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting. Implant Dentistry, 22(16), 662-665. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000001
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ID.0000000000000001
dc.identifier.endpage665
dc.identifier.issn1056-6163
dc.identifier.issn1538-2982
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage662
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2685
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLıppincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofImplant Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPiezosurgery
dc.subjectSinus Lift
dc.subjectRotative Instruments
dc.subjectSwelling
dc.subjectPain
dc.titleComparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Delilbasi-Cagrı 2013.pdf
Boyut:
113.63 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu