Could the long-term oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery in low-risk endometrial cancer also be valid for the high–intermediate-and high-risk patients? A multi-center turkish gynecologic oncology group study conducted with 2745 endometrial cancer cases. (TRSGO-End-001)
| dc.contributor.author | Vardar, Mehmet Ali | |
| dc.contributor.author | Güzel, Ahmet Barış | |
| dc.contributor.author | Taşkın, Selen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Güngör, Mete | |
| dc.contributor.author | Özgül, Nejat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Salman, Coşkun | |
| dc.contributor.author | Küçükgöz Güleç, Ümran | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khatib, Ghada | |
| dc.contributor.author | Taşkıran, Çağatay | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dünder, İlkkan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ortaç, Fırat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yüce, Kunter | |
| dc.contributor.author | Terek, Coşan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Şimşek, Tayup | |
| dc.contributor.author | Özsaran, Aydın | |
| dc.contributor.author | Onan, Anıl | |
| dc.contributor.author | Çoban, Gonca | |
| dc.contributor.author | Topuz, Samet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Demirkıran, Fuat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Takmaz, Özgüç | |
| dc.contributor.author | Köse, Mehmet Faruk | |
| dc.contributor.author | Göçmen, Ahmet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Seydaoğlu, Gülşah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gümürdülü, Derya | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ayhan, Ali | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-30T09:51:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-30T09:51:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Ana Bilim Dalı | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study was conducted to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries in endometrial cancer under the light of the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, with particular focus on the high–intermediate-and high-risk categories. Using multicentric databases between January 2005 and January 2016, disease-free and overall survivals of 2745 endometrial cancer cases were compared according to the surgery route (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy). The high–intermediate-and high-risk patients were defined with respect to the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, and they were analyzed with respect to differences in survival rates. Of the 2745 patients, 1743 (63.5%) were operated by laparotomy, and the remaining were operated with laparoscopy. The total numbers of high–intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases were 734 (45%) patients in the laparotomy group and 307 (30.7%) patients in the laparoscopy group. Disease-free and overall survivals were not statistically different when compared between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of low-, intermediate-, high–intermediateand high-risk endometrial cancer. In conclusion, regardless of the endometrial cancer risk category, long-term oncological outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were found to be comparable to those treated with laparotomy. Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery for high–intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Vardar, M. A., Güzel, A. B., Taşkın, S., Güngör, M., Özgül, N., Salman, C. ... Ayhan, A. (2021). Could the long-term oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery in low-risk endometrial cancer also be valid for the high–intermediate-and high-risk patients? A multi-center turkish gynecologic oncology group study conducted with 2745 endometrial cancer cases. (TRSGO-End-001). Current Oncology, 28(6), 4328-4340. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060368 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/curroncol28060368 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 4340 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1718-7729 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1198-0052 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 4328 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060368 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/8593 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 28 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Current Oncology | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | High-Risk Endometrial Cancer | |
| dc.subject | Laparoscopic Surgery | |
| dc.subject | Survival | |
| dc.title | Could the long-term oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery in low-risk endometrial cancer also be valid for the high–intermediate-and high-risk patients? A multi-center turkish gynecologic oncology group study conducted with 2745 endometrial cancer cases. (TRSGO-End-001) | |
| dc.type | Article |











