Comparison of conventional MRI, MR arthrography, MR arthrography with traction, MR arthrography with pressure in the evaluation of articular distension

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-8532-4917
dc.authorid0000-0003-3122-4499
dc.contributor.authorÖrmeci, Tuğrul
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorAltıntaş, Hilal Melis
dc.contributor.authorDurur Subaşı, Irmak
dc.contributor.authorÇaçan, Mehmet Akif
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-01T05:38:22Z
dc.date.available2022-03-01T05:38:22Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Radyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Anatomi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the performance of conventional MRI, standard MR arthrography, MR arthrography with traction and MR arthrography with pressure in articular distension in patients with ACL injury. Design and patients: The consecutive patients (7 female, 21 male) with acute ACL injured conventional MRI, MR arthrography, MR arthrography with traction and MR arthrography with pressure were evaluated. Results: The amount of distension in the joint was evaluated in the posterior, femorotibial and anterior com- partments. Medially, between the meniscus posterior horn and the tibial corner, MRA with pressure was found to be more effective in showing this distance than MRA with traction (p < 0,05). Laterally, in measurements made between the posterior horn of the meniscus and the capsule, MRA with traction and MRA with pressure are more effective showing this distance than conventional MRI and standard MRA (p < 0,05). In measurements made medially, between the posterior horn of the meniscus and the capsule, MRA with traction is more effective in showing this distance than standard MRA (p < 0,05). In all three different MRA modalities, the lateral femo- rotibial joint distance was found to be statistically higher than conventional MRI (p < 0,05). Medial femorotibial joint distance was found to be statistically higher in MRA with pressure than in conventional MRI and standard MRA (p < 0,05). The medial infrapatellar distance was found to be statistically higher in MRA with pressure than standard MRA and MRA with traction (p < 0,05). The lateral infrapatellar distance is higher in MRA with pressure than in MRA with traction, and this height is statistically significant (p < 0,05). Conclusion: Traction and pressure applications added to MRA will increase the effectiveness of the method by increasing the distension in the knee joint. Although both seem to be effective in creating distension in posterior compartment and femorotibial joint distance, MRA with pressure is more effective especially in anterior compartment.
dc.identifier.citationÖrmeci, T., Tekin, B., Altıntaş, H. M., Durur Subaşı, I. ve Çaçan, M. A. (2022). Comparison of conventional MRI, MR arthrography, MR arthrography with traction, MR arthrography with pressure in the evaluation of articular distension. Journal of Orthopaedics, 30, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.001
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.001
dc.identifier.endpage17
dc.identifier.issn0972-978X
dc.identifier.pmid35210720
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124322595
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage12
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/9033
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wos000820170000003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorÖrmeci, Tuğrul
dc.institutionauthorTekin, Bahar
dc.institutionauthorAltıntaş, H. M.
dc.institutionauthorDurur Subaşı, Irmak
dc.institutionauthorÇaçan, Mehmet Akif
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherReed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orthopaedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectMR Arthrography
dc.subjectMR Arthrography With Traction
dc.subjectMR Arthrography With Pressure
dc.subjectArticular Distension
dc.titleComparison of conventional MRI, MR arthrography, MR arthrography with traction, MR arthrography with pressure in the evaluation of articular distension
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Ormeci-Tugrul-2022.pdf
Boyut:
2.6 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu