Comparison of tunnel and crestal incision techniques in reconstruction of localized alveolar defects

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-1077-7342
dc.contributor.authorAltıparmak, Nur
dc.contributor.authorUçkan, Sina
dc.contributor.authorBayram, Burak
dc.contributor.authorSoydan, Sıdıka
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:56:46Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:56:46Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000413190400020
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 28520823
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare the complication rates of recipient sites prepared using two incision techniques: crestal and tunnel. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, patients underwent augmentation procedures (68 patients; 75 sites) by the same surgeon that were performed consecutively using the crestal incision technique (27 horizontal, 10 vertical; crestal group) or the tunnel incision technique (27 horizontal, 11 vertical; tunnel group). Autogenous bone block grafts were harvested with a piezoelectric surgical device, and the grafts were fixed at the recipient sites by two titanium screws in both groups. The authors evaluated minor exposure, transient paresthesia, major exposure, permanent paresthesia, gingival recession at adjacent teeth, surgery time, and visual analog scale pain scores. Results: Soft tissue dehiscence and graft failure were significantly lower in patients undergoing the tunnel technique. Conclusion: The tunnel incision technique significantly decreased soft tissue exposure, the most common complication of augmentation procedures with autogenous onlay bone grafts. This technique should be considered an alternative to the crestal incision technique for preparation of the recipient site.
dc.identifier.citationAltıparmak, N., Uçkan, S., Bayram, B. ve Soydan, S. (2017). Comparison of tunnel and crestal incision techniques in reconstruction of localized alveolar defects. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 32(5), 1103-1110. https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5275
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.5275
dc.identifier.endpage1110
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.issn1942-4434
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1103
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5275
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2808
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectAlveolar Ridge Augmentation
dc.subjectAutogenous Bone
dc.subjectComplication
dc.subjectFailure
dc.subjectMinimally Invasive Surgery
dc.subjectSubperiosteal Tunnel Technique
dc.titleComparison of tunnel and crestal incision techniques in reconstruction of localized alveolar defects
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Uckan-Sina-2017.pdf
Boyut:
289.23 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu