Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions

dc.authorid0000-0001-7931-4464
dc.authorid0000-0001-9009-6218
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Aslıhan
dc.contributor.authorKılınç, Delal Dara
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:49:53Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:49:53Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000455281500009
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30484184
dc.description.abstractObjectivesThis study was performed to compare the positions of the right and left condyles between male and female patients with different Angle malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) panoramic reconstructions.MethodsThe CBCT images of 60 patients (age of 18-37years) were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided according to their Angle malocclusion classifications (Angle Classes I, II, and III). The condyle-to-eminence, condyle-to-fossa, and condyle-to-meatus distances were measured digitally using i-CAT software.ResultsThe left and right condyle-to-fossa distances were the most variable parameters among the Angle classes. The right condyle-to-eminence and right condyle-to-fossa distances were significantly different among the classes. Male patients seemed to have a greater condyle-to-fossa distance on the right side in both the Class I and III groups. The mean distance from the condyle to eminence, condyle to fossa, and condyle to meatus on the right side was the greatest in the Angle Class II group.ConclusionsIn all three types of malocclusion (Angle Classes I, II, and III), the condyles on both the right and left sides were not exactly symmetric or centrally located within the glenoid fossa. This work emphasizes the differences in the condyle position between male and female patients. Furthermore, the symmetry and centricity of the condyles are not dependent on the patient's sex or type of malocclusion.
dc.identifier.citationAkbulut, A. ve Kılınç, D. D. (2019). Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions. Oral Radiology, 35(1), 43-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0326-z
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-018-0326-z
dc.identifier.endpage50
dc.identifier.issn0911-6028
dc.identifier.issn1613-9674
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage43
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0326-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1808
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofOral Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectCondyle Position
dc.subjectTemporomandibular Joint
dc.subjectPanoramic
dc.subjectCBCT
dc.subjectRicketts
dc.titleEvaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
akbulut, a..pdf
Boyut:
857.51 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text