Endoscopic plantar fascia release versus cryosurgery for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: A prospective randomized study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-4883-4317
dc.contributor.authorÇatal, Bilgehan
dc.contributor.authorBilge, Ali
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Ragıp Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-23T08:37:52Z
dc.date.available2020-03-23T08:37:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractBackground: In a prospective randomized study, we compared two different surgical techniques used in plantar fasciitis surgery. Methods: Forty-eight patients diagnosed as having plantar fasciitis and treated for at least 6 months with no response to conservative modalities were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive endoscopic plantar fascia release (EPFR) or cryosurgery (CS). Patients were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) as a primary outcome measurement at baseline and 3 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. At the final follow-up visit, the Roles-Maudsley score was used to determine patient satisfaction. Results: Five patients did not complete the 1-year follow-up examination (one in the EPFR group and four in the CS group). Thus, the study group included 43 patients. Although both groups showed significant improvement at the final evaluation, the patients in the EPFR group had significantly better AOFAS-AHS scores at 3 months. The success rate (Roles-Maudsley scores of excellent and good) in the EPFR group at 12 months was 87% and in the CS group was 65%. Conclusions: Both EPFR and CS were associated with statistically significant improvements at 1-year follow-up. At 3-month follow-up, EPFR was associated with better results and a higher patient satisfaction rate compared with CS.
dc.identifier.citationÇatal, B., Bilge, A. ve Ulusoy, R. G. (2020). Endoscopic plantar fascia release versus cryosurgery for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: A prospective randomized study. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 110(5). http://doi.org/10.7547/18-082
dc.identifier.doi10.7547/18-082
dc.identifier.issn8750-7315
dc.identifier.issn1930-8264
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.7547/18-082
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/5068
dc.identifier.volume110
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Podiatric Medical Association
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Associationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectEndoscopic Plantar Fascia Release Versus Cryosurgery
dc.subjectChronic Plantar Fasciitis
dc.subjectRandomized Study
dc.titleEndoscopic plantar fascia release versus cryosurgery for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: A prospective randomized study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Catal-Bilgehan-2020.pdf
Boyut:
432.52 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu