Is single-port laparoscopy or vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery the better option for salpingo-oophorectomy?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGülseren, Varol
dc.contributor.authorGüngördük, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorŞahin Uyar, Berican
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, İsa Aykut
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T12:39:56Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T12:39:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare postoperative pain and recovery in patients undergoing oophorectomy with single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES). Method: Patients who underwent salpingo-oophorectomy with SPLS or vNOTES between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Oophorectomy was performed based on the presence of an adnexal mass or breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation. Results: Fifty-two patients underwent oophorectomy with SPLS and 35 underwent vNOTES. Although the mean mass size was slightly larger in the SPLS group than in the vNOTES group (8.0 ± 4.1 vs. 6.8 ± 3.3 cm), the difference was not significant. There was no difference in operating times between SPLS and vNOTES. The mean visual analog scale and faces pain scale scores 2 and 6 h postoperatively were lower in the vNOTES group. The mean quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) score was higher in the vNOTES group (156 ± 14 vs. 148 ± 11; p = 0.009). This analysis identified vNOTES as an independent predictor of a high QoR-40 score. Conclusion: The vNOTES group experienced less pain during the early postoperative period than the SPLS group. Although the operating and removal times were similar, the port setup time was longer for the vNOTES group.
dc.identifier.citationGülseren, V., Güngördük, K., Şahin Uyar, B. ve Özdemir, İ. A. (2024). Is single-port laparoscopy or vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery the better option for salpingo-oophorectomy?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 50(11), 2147-2152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.16112
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jog.16112
dc.identifier.endpage2152
dc.identifier.issn1341-8076
dc.identifier.issn1447-0756
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.pmid39351833
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85205523765
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage2147
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.16112
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/13034
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001322558500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorÖzdemir, İsa Aykut
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAdnexal Mass
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subjectMinimally Invasive Surgery
dc.subjectSingle-Port Laparoscopic Surgery
dc.subjectVaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery
dc.titleIs single-port laparoscopy or vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery the better option for salpingo-oophorectomy?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu